DOUGLAS ISOM, APPELLANT,

v.

R.L. DUGGER, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Pitts v. Nimnicht Chevrolet & Adjustco, Inc., 569 So. 2d 921 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
  …the petition does not affect entitlement to relief, i.e., “[rjelief should not be denied because the petition is mislabeled as a claim or does not take a given form.” Bishop, 414 So. 2d at 597. See also McKenney v. School Board of Palm Beach County, 456 So. 2d 524, 527 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Robinson v. JDM Country Club, 455 So. 2d 1077 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Jenkins Electric, et al. v. Mayes, 393 So. 2d 44 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). Rather, the determining factor appears to be whether the employer/carrier were prejudi…
• Escambia Cnty. Transit & Home Indem. Co. v. Stallworth, 652 So. 2d 905 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)
  …this opinion. ALLEN, J., and WENTWORTH, Senior Judge, concur. . A mislabeled claim for benefits is sufficient to toll the limitations period until a properly labeled petition for modification is filed. McKenney v. School Bd. of Palm Beach County, 456 So. 2d 524 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).…
• ST. Joseph Hosp. & Sedgwick James of Fla., Inc. v. Causey, 667 So. 2d 464 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)
  …mandate in the first appeal in this case. Causey acknowledges our previous rulings stating that the statute of limitations on a petition for modification is not tolled during the pen-dency of an appeal. McKenney v. School Board of Palm Beach County, 456 So. 2d 524, 526 n. 2 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); North American Rockwell v. Filliben, 389 So. 2d 345 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). See also, Davis v. Combination Awning & Shutter Co., 62 So. 2d 742 (Fla.1953). However, our conclusion that modification was unnecessary renders…