UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
JOSE RODRIGUEZ SANTIBANEZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

5th Cir. | 1975-08-11
No. 74-3382
Before GEWIN, GOLDBERG and DYER, Circuit Judges.
517 F.2d 922 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1975) Positive Treatment
Cited by 22 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that stopping vehicles at a permanent checkpoint for citizenship checks and searching a vehicle based on the odor of marijuana are constitutional.


Facts & Procedural History

An immigration officer stopped Santibanez for an immigration check and smelled marijuana. A search revealed 240 pounds of marijuana. Santibanez was co…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

Santibanez was stopped for an immigration check at the La Gloria checkpoint. While interrogating Santibanez concerning his citizenship the immigration officer smelled the odor of marijuana coming from the interior of the vehicle. His assistant thereupon opened the rear door of the station wagon and found 240 pounds of marijuana. Santibanez moved to suppress this evidence. The motion was denied. Santibanez was found guilty of possession of marijuana with the intent to distribute. He appeals, contending that the search and seizure were illegal. We affirm.

We find no constitutional dereliction in stopping vehicles at this permanent checkpoint for the purpose of determining the occupant’s citizenship. Such a stop is considerably less intrusive than a search, Terry v. Ohio, 1968, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889. Cf. United States v. Ortiz, 422 U.S. -, 95 S.Ct. 2585, 45 L.Ed.2d 623, 43 L.W. 5026 (June 30, 1975).1

The odor of marijuana emanating from the vehicle’s interior gave the immigration officer probable cause to then conduct the search. The motion to suppress the evidence was thus properly denied.

Affirmed.

. The question here presented was expressly reserved by the Supreme Court in Ortiz.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (22 total)

Previewing 3 of 22 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw