JAMES MOYE AND BETTY MOYE, HIS WIFE, AND FLORIDA MACHINERY CORPORATION, APPELLANTS,
v.
GENERAL ACCIDENT FIRE & LIFE ASSURANCE CORPORATION, LTD., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, APPELLEE
JAMES MOYE AND BETTY MOYE, HIS WIFE, AND FLORIDA MACHINERY CORPORATION, APPELLANTS,
GENERAL ACCIDENT FIRE & LIFE ASSURANCE CORPORATION, LTD., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, APPELLEE
456 So. 2d 948
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1984)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The Petition for Declaratory Relief in this case raised a single issue of insurance coverage. We affirm the Final Declaratory Summary Judgment insofar as it finds that the insurance policy issued by General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corporation, Ltd. to Florida Machinery Corporation does not provide coverage to any of the named defendants in a separate personal injury action.
We reverse the findings and conclusion on the issue of liability. The question of liability on the part of defendant Florida Machinery Corporation was not before the trial court, and even if it had been, the record reveals that genuine issues of material fact existed so as to preclude summary judgment.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pickersgill v. State, 516 So. 2d 92 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)…g home, backing up camper next to the apartment and leaving hurriedly shortly thereafter, notwithstanding fact that officers’ blocked view prevented them from observing whether defendant was loading marijuana into the camper); State v. Van-Nostrand, 456 So. 2d 948 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984) (initial stop of defendant when he drove into driveway of a home under police surveillance was reasonable); see also Gadsen v. State, 498 So. 2d 1339 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) (police did not have probable cause to search automobile base…