RAYMOND H. WOOD, JR., D.D.S., AND JOHN J. MORGAN, D.D.S., APPELLANTS,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF DENTISTRY, APPELLEE
RAYMOND H. WOOD, JR., D.D.S., AND JOHN J. MORGAN, D.D.S., APPELLANTS,
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF DENTISTRY, APPELLEE
456 So. 2d 1197
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1984)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. Rush v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Podiatry, 448 So. 2d 26 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).
ERVIN, C.J., and BOOTH and WENT-WORTH, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Getelman v. Burton R. Levey, 481 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)…or exclude it.” Staninger v. Jacksonville Expressway Authority, 182 So. 2d at 489. Finally, we hold the trial court properly refused to give an instruction on comparative negligence. See Besett v. Basnett, 389 So. 2d 995 (Fla.1980); Gold v. Perry, 456 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). On cross-appeal, Mr. Levey contends that he is entitled to prejudgment interest from the date he sold his one-half interest in the property to Mr. Getelman. Mr. Levey’s entitlement to prejudgment interest depends upon whether h…
-
Ray Cruise & Epic Mortg. & Fin. Servs., Inc. v. Graham, 622 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)…o the trial court’s refusal to instruct the jury on appellee’s duty to investigate the representations made to him, thus holding him comparatively negligent for any fraud perpetrated on him and appellee. Appellants rely on the case of Gold v. Perry, 456 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), to support their argument that the trial court erred in not instructing the jury on comparative fault. In Gold v. Perry, this court held that the trial court erred in instructing the jury that a party who investigates a matter…
-
Raymond H. Wood, Jr., D.D.S. v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 490 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)…e August 4, 1983. The order did not reserve jurisdiction in the Board to entertain a petition for reinstatement. Dr. Wood’s appeal of the revocation to this court was affirmed. Wood v. State Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Dentistry, 456 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). In his appeal, Dr. Wood raised no issue concerning the Board’s failure to provide in its order any terms or conditions for reinstatement of his license. The Board granted a stay during the pendency of his appeal, allowing Dr. Wo…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Rush v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 448 So. 2d 26 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)