JAMES PHILLIP WOZNIAK, APPELLANT,
v.
LYNNE CARR WOZNIAK, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1984-10-09
No. 84-418
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J, and DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.
456 So. 2d 1318 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1984) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

In the absence of a petition and evidence showing a substantial change of circumstances of either party, the trial court may not modify the terms of a child custody and support order. Morgan v. Morgan, 429 So. 2d 432 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Koken v. Neubauer, 374 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Meltzer v. Meltzer, 356 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 370 So. 2d 460 (Fla.1979).

Reversed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Kuutti v. Tommi L. Kuutti, 645 So. 2d 80 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)
    …ver determined in the final dissolution because the mother denied pregnancy. Therefore, there is no requirement that the petition and evidence show substantial change of circumstances, as in a typical modification proceeding. See Wozniak v. Wozniak, 456 So. 2d 1318 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). The mother substantially relies upon language in this court’s opinion in DeCamp v. Hein, 541 So. 2d 708 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 551 So. 2d 461 (Fla.1989), arguing that, there, this court recognized the continuing validity o…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw