JOHN SCOTT MEYERS, ETC., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1984-06-28
No. 82-1277
HERSEY, HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
457 So. 2d 495 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1984) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

ORDERED upon mandate of the United States Supreme Court issued, May 23, 1984, which quashes the decision of this court filed April 20, 1983, 432 So. 2d 97, we hereby adopt the decision of the United State Supreme Court issued April 23, 1984. — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 1852, 80 L.Ed.2d 381.

UPON APPELLEE’S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

In adopting the decision of the United States Supreme Court issued April 23, 1984, as we did by order dated June 28, 1984, and in denying appellant’s Motion for Rehearing, as we did by order dated September 12, 1984, it was our intention and ruling that appellant’s conviction be affirmed on all accounts.

Appellee’s Motion for Clarification is granted as above stated.

Granted.

HERSEY, HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Dep't OF Ins. v. Dade Cnty. Consumer Advocate's Off., 492 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. 1986)
    …OVERTON, Justice. This appeal from Dade County Consumer Advocate’s Office v. Department of Insurance, 457 So. 2d 495 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), concerns the validity of sections 626.-611(11) and 626.9541(l)(h)l, Florida Stat [*1033] utes (1983),1 which prohibit insurance agents from accepting from their customers a commission lower than the commission set by the insurer…
  • Chicago Title Ins. Co. v. Butler, 770 So. 2d 1210 (Fla. 2000)
    …ublic from discrimination. The district court reversed, concluding that it was unable to find a legitimate state interest “justifying the continued existence of the anti-rebate statutes.” Dade County Consumer Advocate’s Office v. Department of Ins., 457 So. 2d 495, 497 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). On review, this Court affirmed, finding that the anti-rebate statutes at issue unconstitutionally interfered with a citizen’s property rights by unnecessarily limiting the bargaining power of the consuming public. See Dade…
    1 / 2
  • United Wis. Life Ins. Co. v. Off. OF Ins. Reg., 849 So. 2d 417 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)
    …e, however, defines “same actuarially supportable class” or “essentially the same hazard.” In fact there has been relatively little case law directly dealing with this section. See, e.g., Dade County Consumer Advocate’s Office v. Department of Ins., 457 So. 2d 495, 499 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), aff'd 492 So. 2d 1032 (Fla.1986) (noting in dicta that allowing an agent to discount a portion of his commission to an individual purchaser without offering same to others would be considered an unfair method of competition…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw