CERTIFIED GROCERS AND CORPORATE GROUP SERVICE, INC., APPELLANTS,
v.
PHILLIP W. HAGEN, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that while there was sufficient evidence of an accident arising in the course of employment and no error in awarding temporary total disability benefits, the deputy commissioner's failure to rule on the employer's notice defense necessitates a remand.
[1] An accident arises in the course of employment when there is competent, substantial evidence to support such a finding.
[2] A deputy commissioner's award of temporary total disability benefits is not erroneous if the accident is otherwise compensable.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceA claimant was injured during employment and sought temporary total disability benefits. The employer raised a defense of lack of formal notice of inj…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Claim For Temporary Total Disability Benefits cases and more on FLexlaw
SMITH, Judge.
This appeal raises two interrelated questions: whether claimant’s accident occurred during the course of his employment with appellant Certified Grocers, and if so, whether the deputy commissioner erred in awarding claimant temporary total disability (TTD) benefits from May 11, 1983, and continuing, in view of claimant’s alleged failure to provide the E/C with formal notice of injury, pursuant to Section 440.185, Florida Statutes (1981). Upon examination of the record on appeal and the briefs filed with this court, we find competent, substantial evidence to support the deputy commissioner’s finding that claimant’s injury was the result of an accident arising in the course of his employment. We also find, if claimant’s accident is otherwise compensable, no error in the deputy’s award of TTD benefits.
However, the deputy commissioner failed to specifically rule on the E/C’s notice defense in his initial order, and even after a motion for reconsideration was filed by the E/C, the deputy commissioner issued an amended order which still failed to address the pending notice defense. Therefore, in the present posture of this case, we find it necessary to reverse the order appealed from and remand for a ruling on the E/C’s notice defense. University of Florida v. Green, 395 So. 2d 258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Westberry v. Copeland Sausage Company, 389 So. 2d 1214 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).
Since a final determination on this claim cannot be made until after the deputy rules on the pending notice defense, claimant’s petition for attorney’s fees in this court is provisionally granted in accordance with a separate order to be issued concurrently with this opinion. The attorney’s fees sought by claimant shall be payable only in the event the claimant prevails below on remand regarding the E/C’s notice defense, in which case the deputy commissioner’s order shall include the award of attorney’s fees to claimant for this appeal.
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED with directions.
BOOTH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Citrus Cnty. Human Servs. & Mission Ins. Co. v. Cross, 485 So. 2d 874 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)…ta v. Teleflex, Inc., 382 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). However, the deputy failed to specifically rule on the E/C’s notice defense. Therefore, we reverse the order appealed from and remand for a ruling on that defense. Certified Grocers v. Hagen, 457 So. 2d 576 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). The deputy also erred in his award of TTD benefits for the period stated in the order. An award of TTD benefits may ordinarily be made only when there is medical evidence of a claimant’s inability to work or, absent such evide…
Authorities Cited
- Westberry v. Copeland Sausage Co., 389 So. 2d 1214 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980)
- Univ. OF Fla. & Div. of Risk Mgmt. v. Green, 395 So. 2d 258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)