PATRICIA WELSCH ET AL., APPELLEES,
v.
VERA J. LIKINS ET AL., APPELLANTS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the award of costs, finding the Eleventh Amendment did not bar the award and the trial court did not abuse its discretion.
Plaintiffs, representing a class of mentally retarded persons committed to state hospitals, moved for costs after obtaining declaratory relief. The di…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Taxation Of Costs cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This lawsuit was commenced by six mentally retarded persons as a class action on behalf of all those persons who had been committed to Minnesota state hospitals as mentally deficient. The district court granted declaratory relief in Welsch v. Likins, 373 F.Supp. 487 (D.Minn.1974), and issued a supplementary order requiring affirmative state action in Welsch v. Likins, No. 4-72 Civ. 451 (D.Minn., filed Oct. 1, 1974).
Thereafter, plaintiffs moved that costs be assessed against the defendants, administrators serving the State of Minnesota, including the commissioner and assistant commissioner of the Department of Public Welfare and the administrators of six state hospitals for the mentally retarded. On May 22, 1975, the district court taxed costs in favor of plaintiffs in the sum of $5,521, the precise amount requested by the plaintiffs. The defendants have appealed contending:
1) that the eleventh amendment bars an award of costs since that award will be paid from the state treasury, or, alternatively,
2) that the trial court exceeded the bounds of its permissible discretion by awarding costs in the full amount requested by plaintiffs.
Judge Earl R. Larson gave these same contentions extensive consideration and wrote a detailed and persuasive memorandum opinion in support of his order taxing costs in this ease.1 Anything that we might add would be redundant.
Accordingly, we affirm the award of costs on the basis of Judge Larson’s memorandum decision.
. Welsch v. Likins, 68 F.R.D. 589 (D.Minn. 1975).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Copper Liquor, Inc. v. Adolph Coors Co., 684 F.2d 1087 (5th Cir. 1982)
-
Shakey's Inc. v. Covalt, 704 F.2d 426 (9th Cir. 1983)
-
Welsch v. Likins, 550 F.2d 1122 (8th Cir. 1977)
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence