PATRICIA WELSCH ET AL., APPELLEES,
v.
VERA J. LIKINS ET AL., APPELLANTS

8th Cir. | 1975-11-17
No. 75-1550
Before BRIGHT, WEBSTER and HENLEY, Circuit Judges.
525 F.2d 987 United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (1975) Caution
Cited by 18 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court affirmed the award of costs, finding the Eleventh Amendment did not bar the award and the trial court did not abuse its discretion.


Facts & Procedural History

Plaintiffs, representing a class of mentally retarded persons committed to state hospitals, moved for costs after obtaining declaratory relief. The di…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This lawsuit was commenced by six mentally retarded persons as a class action on behalf of all those persons who had been committed to Minnesota state hospitals as mentally deficient. The district court granted declaratory relief in Welsch v. Likins, 373 F.Supp. 487 (D.Minn.1974), and issued a supplementary order requiring affirmative state action in Welsch v. Likins, No. 4-72 Civ. 451 (D.Minn., filed Oct. 1, 1974).

Thereafter, plaintiffs moved that costs be assessed against the defendants, administrators serving the State of Minnesota, including the commissioner and assistant commissioner of the Department of Public Welfare and the administrators of six state hospitals for the mentally retarded. On May 22, 1975, the district court taxed costs in favor of plaintiffs in the sum of $5,521, the precise amount requested by the plaintiffs. The defendants have appealed contending:

1) that the eleventh amendment bars an award of costs since that award will be paid from the state treasury, or, alternatively,

2) that the trial court exceeded the bounds of its permissible discretion by awarding costs in the full amount requested by plaintiffs.

Judge Earl R. Larson gave these same contentions extensive consideration and wrote a detailed and persuasive memorandum opinion in support of his order taxing costs in this ease.1 Anything that we might add would be redundant.

Accordingly, we affirm the award of costs on the basis of Judge Larson’s memorandum decision.

. Welsch v. Likins, 68 F.R.D. 589 (D.Minn. 1975).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw