CHARLES A. MORGAN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
RAYMOND D. MASSEY, SUPERINTENDENT, UNION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A reconstructed record can provide effective appellate review, and a privately retained attorney's actions do not establish state involvement for federal habeas corpus relief.
Appellant claimed his conviction appeal was ineffective due to the absence of a trial transcript, as his privately retained counsel did not request a …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Reconstruction Of Record cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
This is an appeal from a district court judgment denying relief to petitioner in a habeas corpus proceeding. We affirm the judgment of the district court.
Appellant asserts that the non-existence of his trial transcript precluded an effective appeal of his manslaughter conviction in the state court of Florida. His privately retained counsel, in an apparent effort to diminish his client’s expenses, did not request a court reporter for the criminal proceeding.
Despite the appellant’s contentions to the contrary, a reconstructed record, as opposed to a verbatim transcript, can accord effective appellate review. Mayer v. City of Chicago, 404 U.S. 189, at 194, 92 S.Ct. 410, 30 L.Ed.2d 372 (1971), citing Draper v. Washington, 372 U.S. 487, 495-496, 83 S.Ct. 774, 9 L.Ed.2d 899 (1963). This is especially true where, as here, the state appellate rules establish a procedure for reconstruction of the trial record. See Rules 6.7(f) and 6.9(d) of the Florida Appellate Rules. Appellant is unable to complain of an inadequate record for appellate review since he made no effort to compile an alternative record pursuant to the appellate rules.
Furthermore, Morgan has failed to demonstrate the state involvement which is a requisite to federal habeas corpus relief. His attorney having been privately retained, appellant has not shown that a state official connected with the criminal proceeding who could have remedied the conduct failed in his duty to accord justice to the accused. See Fitzgerald v. Estelle, 505 F. 2d 1334, 1337 (5th Cir. 1975).
Appellant not having convinced us that the district court was clearly erroneous in denying the writ, we must affirm the judgment of the district court.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. LaSPESA, 956 F.2d 1027 (11th Cir. 1992)
-
United States v. Cashwell, 950 F.2d 699 (11th Cir. 1992)
-
Harris v. Estelle, 583 F.2d 775 (5th Cir. 1978)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Draper v. Washington, 372 U.S. 487 (U.S. 1963)
- Mayer v. City of Chicago, 404 U.S. 189 (U.S. 1971)
- Fitzgerald v. Estelle, 505 F.2d 1334 (5th Cir. 1974)