CONTINENTAL REAL ESTATE EQUITIES, INC., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS GENERAL PARTNER OF CONTINENTAL REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, LTD., AND CONTINENTAL REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, LTD., APPELLANTS,
v.
RICH MAN POOR MAN, INC., APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A shopping mall owner sought to collect back real estate taxes from a tenant after failing to bill for nearly two years. The court held that the lessor's combined failure to bill, coupled with the mall manager's statement that there would be no tax charges in the first year, constituted a waiver of taxes through March 1982, but not beyond that point where mere absence of billing was insufficient evidence of waiver.
The court held that the lessor waived its right to collect real estate taxes through March 1982 based on the combination of its failure to bill and the mall manager's statement that there would be no tax charges for the first year. However, the mere absence of monthly billings after that point was insufficient evidence of waiver, and the lessee remained obligated for taxes commencing April 1, 1982.
[1] A waiver is an intentional or voluntary relinquishment of a known right, which may be inferred from conduct but does not arise from forbearance for a reasonable time.
[2] A landlord's failure to bill a tenant for additional rent for a period of time does not automatically constitute a waiver of the right to collect back charges.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“A waiver is an intentional or voluntary relinquishment of a known right.”
Establishes the legal definition of waiver that governs the court's analysis
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceContinental Real Estate leased space in Lakeland Mall to Rich Man Poor Man, Inc. under a five-year lease commencing April 1, 1981, requiring the lesse…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Intentional Relinquishment Of A Known Right cases and more on FLexlaw
GRIMES, Acting Chief Judge.
This appeal involves the issue of whether a shopping mall owner waived its right to collect a proportionate share of real estate taxes from one of its tenants as provided by the lease.
Appellee/lessee rented space in Lakeland Mall from appellant/lessor under a written five-year lease commencing April 1, 1981. The lease required the lessee to pay as additional rent its proportionate share of real estate taxes levied upon the mall. The tax payments were to be made in monthly increments based upon the most current notice of assessment or tax bill, and thereafter adjusted to reflect the actual taxes for the applicable period. As a result of oversight, the lessor did not bill appellee for its proportionate share of taxes from April 1981, through March 1983. On May 3, 1983, the lessor realized that the lessee had not been paying the taxes and made a demand for the back taxes.
After the lessee refused to pay the taxes, the lessor brought suit in county court for collection of the taxes and for eviction of the lessee from the mall. The lessee counterclaimed for more than the county court’s jurisdiction, and the matter was transferred to circuit court. Following a hearing, the judge concluded that the appellant’s inattention to the tax charges constituted a waiver of its right to collect the charges for the years 1981 and 1982 and denied the appellant’s suit for eviction. The court ruled that the lessee was obligated for its share of the taxes commencing on January 1,1983. The counterclaim was severed and remains pending. The lessor appeals all aspects of the ruling, and the lessee cross-appeals contending that the lessor also waived the taxes for the first three months of 1983.
A waiver is an intentional or voluntary relinquishment of a known right. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co. v. Vogel, 195 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967). It may be inferred from one’s conduct but does not arise from forebearance for a reasonable time. Gilman v. Butzloff, 155 Fla. 888, 22 So. 2d 263 (1945). In Mercede v. Mercede Park Italian Restaurant, 392 So. 2d 997 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), the court held that the landlord’s failure to bill his tenant for monthly cost of living increases for a period of twenty-one months did not constitute a waiver of the right to collect the back charges.
Since the lessor possessed the data for computation of the monthly tax charges, it may be assumed that the lessor had a responsibility to send monthly bills to the lessee for its share of the taxes. Therefore, its unexplained failure to do so, when coupled with the testimony of the former mall manager that he told the lessee’s president that there would be no real estate tax charges for the first year of the lease is sufficient to support the court’s finding of waiver to that extent. Beyond that point the record reflects the mere absence of monthly billings which, by itself, is insufficient evidence of a waiver. Under the circumstances, the court properly exercised its discretion in refusing to order an eviction. Our determination of the lessor’s claim for back tax charges necessarily disposes of the cross-appeal adversely to the position of the lessee.
We affirm the judgment in all respects with the exception of the duration of the waiver. We remand the case with directions to enter an order reflecting the lessee’s obligation for its share of the taxes after April 1, 1982.
SCHEB and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Torres v. K-Site 500 Assocs. & Chicago Title Ins. Co., 632 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)…-for their failure to close. A waiver is the intentional relinquishment of a known right and may be express or implied. Thomas N. Carlton Estate v. Keller, 52 So. 2d 131 (Fla.1951); Continental Real Estate Equities, Inc. v. Rich Man Poor Man, Inc., 458 So. 2d 798 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co. v. Vogel, 195 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967). A party may waive any rights to which he or she is legally entitled, by actions or conduct warranting an inference that a known right has been relinquished. Gilm…
-
Am. Somax Ventures v. Touma, 547 So. 2d 1266 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)…and Manufacturing Corp., 465 So. 2d 581, 587 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Fireman’s Fund, 195 So. 2d at 24. Furthermore, waiver does not arise merely from forbearance for a reasonable time. Continental Real Estate Equities, Inc. v. Rich Man Poor Man, Inc., 458 So. 2d 798, 799 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), citing Gilman v. Butzloff, 155 Fla. 888, 22 So. 2d 263 (1945). The facts supporting appellees’ waiver of the written notice of the extension of the closing date are uncontradicted in the evidence. Although closing was to ta…
-
Wash-Bowl Vending Co., Inc. v. NO. 3 Condo. Ass'n, 485 So. 2d 1307 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)…y of such lease, or effects a ratification of the lease. Waiver is the intentional relinquishment of a known right. Gilman v. Butz- [*1311] loff, 155 Fla. 888, 22 So. 2d 263 (1945); Continental Real Estate Equities, Inc. v. Rich Man Poor Man, Inc., 458 So. 2d 798 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); O’Brien v. O’Brien, 424 So. 2d 970 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). However, there can be no waiver without knowledge, express or implied, of that which is being waived. Gulf Life Insurance Co. v. Green, 80 So. 2d 321 (Fla.1955); Guaranty Nat…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Gilman v. Butzloff, 155 Fla. 888 (Fla. 1945)
- Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. Vogel, 195 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967)
- Mercede v. The Mercede Park Italian Rest., Inc., 392 So. 2d 997 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)