ALLEN BERGLIN AND CELIA BERGLIN, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,
v.
ADAMS CHEVROLET, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1984-11-14
No. 83-2415
WALDEN and BARKETT, JJ., concur.
458 So. 2d 866 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1984) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Allen Berglin, a crime scene investigator, was injured when a garage door fell on him while investigating a burglary at Adams Chevrolet. The court reversed summary judgment for the defendant, holding that disputed factual issues regarding whether Adams Chevrolet breached its duty to warn of the dangerous condition precluded summary judgment.


Holding

Summary judgment was improper because material factual disputes existed regarding whether Adams Chevrolet knew of the dangerous condition and failed to warn Berglin, which are questions that must be resolved by a trier of fact.


Headnotes

[1] A landowner owes a duty of ordinary care to a person on the land with the landowner's permission and of whose presence the landowner is aware, when the injury is caused b…

[2] The duty owed by a landowner to a licensee is to refrain from wanton negligence or willful misconduct and to warn of known dangerous conditions not open to ordinary obser…

Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Adams Chevrolet was obligated to refrain from wanton negligence or willful conduct which would injure the appellant and to warn him of any defect or condition known to the defendant to be-dangerous if such danger was not open to ordinary observation by the plaintiff.”

Establishes the legal duty owed by the property owner to a licensee

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Allen Berglin, a crime scene investigator for the Delray Beach Police Department, was summoned to Adams Chevrolet to investigate a burglary. An overha…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
GREEN, OLIVER L., Jr., Associate Judge.

GREEN, OLIVER L., Jr., Associate Judge.

This is an appeal by Allen Berglin and Celia Berglin, his wife, plaintiffs below, from a Final Summary Judgment rendered in favor of Adams Chevrolet, defendant below, in a personal injury action alleging willful negligence. We reverse.

The facts are that Allen Berglin was a crime scene investigator for the City of Delray Beach Police Department. He was summoned to the premises of Adams Chevrolet to investigate a burglary. The manager (also referred to as foreman) of Adams Chevrolet and another Delray Beach Police Officer, who was also there, were aware that an overhanging garage door, apparently damaged in the burglary, was in a precarious position as it was off a supporting roller track. The manager testified by deposition that he warned the appellant of this dangerous condition. The appellant’s fellow officer testified by deposition that he was aware of the dangerous condition, but he does not recall if he mentioned this to appellant.

Appellant testified by deposition that the manager did not point out the dangerous condition and further stated as follows:

Q Are you telling me you didn’t know it was off the track?

A I didn’t know it was off the track.

Q And you’re telling me that the other officer on the scene that knew it was off the track didn’t tell you?

A Nobody told me the door was off the track.

Q Okay. So tell me what happened.

A The two guys lowered the door down. I went over to the door. I took pictures of the hole. I dusted for fingerprints. Now, the door was about chest high or a little bit higher so I could work on it. As I was going to write notes, I ducked under the door and at the same time I put my hand on the door to raise it up a little bit higher to go outside. I went outside and I was standing there and I started hearing people yell behind me, which I don’t pay that much attention to people yelling anyway. The next thing I knew is I heard all this noise and the door came down and it hit me and pushed me about a foot away from it. So I was sitting there cussing and swearing because I got hit by the door, which you know, is kind of dumb in the first place.

And the foreman came around and he says, “I was afraid” — and I remember he says, “I was afraid to come around here and see what you looked like.” I said, “Why?” He said, “Well, that big a door falling on top of somebody,” he says, “I -thought you were dead.” I said, “No. It hit me,” I said, “but no problem.”

We are not dealing with an issue as to whether appellant is entitled to recover solely because of a dangerous condition of the premises. The appellant occupied the status of a licensee on the premises of the appellee. Adams Chevrolet was obligated to refrain from wanton negligence or willful conduct which would injure the appellant and to warn him of any defect or condition known to the defendant to be-dangerous if such danger was not open to ordinary observation by the plaintiff. There are disputed issues upon which a trier of fact could conclude that the appel-lee breached this duty to the appellant. Whitten v. Miami Dade Water and Sewer Authority, 357 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Hall v. Holton, 330 So. 2d 81 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

WALDEN and BARKETT, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Evans v. J. Roberts Constr., Inc., 527 So. 2d 918 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988)
    …burden of avoiding the risk.72 Id. at 156-57. I am concerned about the decision herein in view of the fact that two members of the court and an associate judge made a clear expression of the law as they perceived it in Berglin v. Adams Chevrolet, 458 So. 2d 866 (Fla. 4th DCA1984). At oral argument in the present case I suggested there was no more emergency in Berglin than is involved in some emergency motions that are filed here. In light of Dean Prosser’s above quoted observation, I fail to see the reaso…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw