UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,
v.
BENJAMIN STAGG, APPELLANT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the rule established in United States v. Demma, regarding the timing of entrapment defenses, should apply to cases pending on appeal.
Stagg was convicted of drug offenses, and his entrapment defense was presented only after he testified and admitted the government's evidence. The dis…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Retroactivity Of Judicial Decisions cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
Stagg’s six-count conviction for conspiracy and for possessing and distributing co caine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), and 18 U.S.C. § 2 (aiding and abetting), is remanded for a new trial. United States v. Demma, 523 F. 2d 981 (9th Cir. 1975) (en banc).
The district court, believing at the time of trial that it was bound by Eastman v. United States, 212 F. 2d 320 (9th Cir. 1954), did not permit Stagg to present his tendered entrapment defense until after he took the stand and admitted the conduct described by the government’s witnesses.
In United States v. Demma, supra, decided after this case was tried, we held that the Eastman rule was inconsistent with Supreme Court decisions on entrapment. We overruled Eastman without indicating whether Demma should apply to pending cases. We did point out, however, that the rule in Demma was not a declaration of a new rule of law, but merely a correction of an aberration which began with Eastman. Accordingly, there is no reason for refusing to apply Demma to cases pending on appeal at the time Demma was decided. United States v. Hart (9th Cir. 1976) (en banc).
Vacated and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Paduano, 549 F.2d 145 (9th Cir. 1977)
Authorities Cited
- United States v. Demma, 523 F.2d 981 (9th Cir. 1975)
- Eastman v. United States, 212 F.2d 320 (9th Cir. 1954)