BOB LOKEY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
H. L. RICHARDSON, ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
BOB LOKEY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
H. L. RICHARDSON, ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
540 F.2d 1022
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1976)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Because the legal and factual considerations relevant to the decision of this case’ in light of Montanye v. Haymes, - U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 2543, 49 L.Ed.2d-(1976), and Meachum v. Fano, -U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 2532, 49 L.Ed.2d-(1976), were not addressed by the parties or the district court, the summary judgment, reversed by the Court of Appeals, 9 Cir., 527 F. 2d 949, with certiorari granted by the Supreme Court, - U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 3186, 49 L.Ed.2d -, is vacated and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with those decisions.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lokey v. Richardson, 600 F.2d 1265 (9th Cir. 1979)
Authorities Cited
- Meachum v. Fano, 427 U.S. 215 (U.S. 1976)
- Montanye v. Haymes, 427 U.S. 236 (U.S. 1976)
- Lokey v. Richardson, 527 F.2d 949 (9th Cir. 1975)