DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PETITIONER,
v.
IVIA JEAN NEWSOME, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1984-11-08
No. 64268
OVERTON, ALDERMAN, McDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur., BOYD, C.J., and ADKINS, J., dissent.
459 So. 2d 314 Florida Supreme Court (1984) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We originally accepted jurisdiction in this cause, reported below as Newsome v. Department of Corrections, 435 So. 2d 887 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), on the basis of conflict with Mastrandrea v. J. Mann, Inc., 128 So. 2d 146 (Fla.3d DCA), cert. denied, 133 So. 2d 320 (Fla.1961). After hearing oral argument, however, we find that there is no express and direct conflict and, consequently, there is no basis for this Court to accept jurisdiction in this cause. The petition for review is denied.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, ALDERMAN, McDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur. BOYD, C.J., and ADKINS, J., dissent.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ENTERTAINED BY THE COURT. SEE FLA.R.APP.P. 9.330(d).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State v. Yamuni, 498 So. 2d 441 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
    …Newsome v. Department of Corrections, 435 So. 2d 887 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983) (section 945.11, Florida Statutes (1979), im [*443] poses upon the Department of Corrections a duty to supervise inmates even while “on loan” to another agency), review denied, 459 So. 2d 314 (Fla.1984). The intent of the legislature in enacting section 827.07, Florida Statutes (1979), was “to provide for comprehensive protective services for abused or neglected children found in the state.” § 827.07(1). This statute singles out a class…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw