THE FLORIDA BAR, PETITIONER,
v.
FRANK W. PETERMAN, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Court approved the respondent's petition for leave to resign permanently without leave to reapply.
Respondent, Mr. Peterman, petitioned for leave to resign permanently from The Florida Bar without leave to reapply. The Florida Bar responded, support…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Waiver Of Confidentiality cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This matter is before the Court on respondent’s Petition for Leave to Resign Permanently Without Leave to Reapply, pursuant to article XI, Rule 11.08 of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar. The Florida Bar filed its response supporting the Petition and stating:
1. That Mr. Peterman is endeavoring to make restitution to his clients as noted in the Petition;
2. That Mr. Peterman has agreed to cooperate with any client security fund investigation made by The Florida Bar;
3. That Mr. Peterman has waived confidentiality of all disciplinary matters mentioned in his Petition for Resignation; and
4. That the Petition is without leave to apply for readmission permanently. Pursuant to article XI, Rule 11.08(6), of the Integration Rule, such condition shall preclude any readmission.
The Court having reviewed the Petition for Leave to Resign and the response of The Florida Bar and determined that the requirements of Rule 11.08(3) are fully satisfied, the Petition for Leave to Resign Permanently Without Leave to Reapply is hereby approved, effective immediately.
Costs in the amount of $184.40 are hereby taxed against respondent.
It is so ordered.
ADKINS, A.C.J., and OVERTON, ALDERMAN, McDonald and SHAW, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Alvord v. Dugger, 541 So. 2d 598 (Fla. 1989)…Court for a writ of extraordinary relief and requested a judicial determination of his competency to be executed separate from the existing procedure under section 922.07, Florida Statutes (1983). This Court denied that petition in Alvord v. State, 459 So. 2d 316 (Fla.1984) [Alvord IV]. Alvord initially presented the instant ha-beas corpus petition before this Court seeking (1) a stay of the mental examination directed by the governor to determine his competency to be executed and (2) a new sentencing proce…
-
Adams v. Louie L. Wainwright, 484 So. 2d 580 (Fla. 1986)…authorizing a non-adversarial executive determination of competency to be executed as violative of due process. We have considered and rejected such attacks on the validity of 922.07. Goode v. Wainwright, 448 So. 2d 999 (Fla.1984); Alvord v. State, 459 So. 2d 316 (Fla.1984). See also Solesbee v. Balkcom, 339 U.S. 9, 70 S.Ct. 457, 94 L.Ed. 604 (1950); Caritativo v. California, 357 U.S. 549, 78 S.Ct. 1263, 2 L.Ed.2d 1531 (1958). We therefore deny the requested stay of execution. It is so ordered. BOYD, C.J…
-
Alvord v. State, 694 So. 2d 704 (Fla. 1997)…ered a competency evaluation pursuant to section 922.07, Florida Statutes (1983). Alvord then filed a petition with this Court seeking to be evaluated separate from the procedures set forth in that statute. That petition was denied. Alvord v. State, 459 So. 2d 316 (Fla.1984)(Alvord V). After our decision in Alvord V, Alvord was found to be incompetent by psychiatrists appointed by the Governor. The Governor then ordered that a future mental examination be conducted on September 29, 1987. On April 22, 1987, t…