UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
ROBERT BAZAN-MOLINA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

5th Cir. | 1976-12-16
No. 76-2348
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and GEWIN and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.
544 F.2d 193 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1976) Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

Stopping vehicles at permanent border patrol checkpoints and searching them based on probable cause does not violate the Fourth Amendment.


Facts & Procedural History

The appellant was stopped at a permanent border patrol checkpoint, and the officer detected the odor of marijuana and observed debris. A subsequent se…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

[*194] PER CURIAM:

Robert Bazan-Molina has appealed from his conviction in the Southern District of Texas for possession of ISO pounds of marijuana with intent to distribute. Finding his only contention to be without merit, we affirm.

While driving on United States Highway 281, the appellant was stopped at a permanent border patrol checkpoint located seven miles south of Falfurrias, Texas. The appellant’s vehicle had all of the windows rolled up. When the appellant opened his door to respond to the border patrolman’s questions concerning his citizenship status, the officer detected the odor of marijuana emanating from the vehicle. With suspicions aroused, the officer peered through the windows of the vehicle and noticed seeds and leaves resembling marijuana on the floor below the backseat of the car. A subsequent search yielded 130 pounds of marijuana in brick form.

Appellant contends that the stopping of his vehicle and the ensuing search violated his rights under the Fourth Amendment. This conclusion is unwarranted under the decisions of this court. We have consistently held that the border patrol checkpoint near Falfurrias, Texas is a permanent checkpoint. Stopping vehicles at such checkpoints to inquire into citizenship does not violate the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, — U.S. —, 96 S.Ct. 3074, 49 L.Ed.2d 1116 (1976). Searching a vehicle at a permanent checkpoint is valid if, after stopping the vehicle, the border patrolman has probable cause to make the search. United States v. Ortiz, 422 U.S. 891, 95 S.Ct. 2585, 45 L.Ed.2d 623 (1975). The officer’s detection of the odor of marijuana coupled with his observation of marijuana debris in the backseat area furnished probable cause for the search. United States v. Torres, 537 F. 2d 1299, 1300 (5th Cir. 1976).

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw