MARSHELL JOSEPH HILL, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MARSHELL JOSEPH HILL, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
459 So. 2d 434
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1984)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the defendant’s conviction for armed robbery upon a holding that the error in admitting a passing reference to the defendant being identified as the perpetrator of the crime, even if arguably hearsay under Molina v. State, 406 So. 2d 57 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), and Postell v. State, 398 So. 2d 851 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 411 So. 2d 384 (Fla.1981), was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt in light of, among other things, the defendant’s complete confession to the crime, the admission of which is not challenged on appeal, and the fact that the reference played no further part in the State’s case.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rangel Hernandez v. State, 547 So. 2d 138 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)…The admonition to hide the gun, the alleged hearsay portion of this evidence, added little to the state’s ease; the error in admitting such testimony was therefore entirely harmless, see State v. DiGuilio, 491 So. 2d 1129 (Fla.1986); Hill v. State, 459 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); cf. Priestly v. State, 450 So. 2d 289, 291 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). AFFIRMED.…
-
Times v. State, 563 So. 2d 1113 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)…overlooked the defendant’s contrary arguments on appeal, but are not persuaded thereby. Pringle v. State, 553 So. 2d 1304 (Fla.3d DCA 1989); McGriff v. State, 497 So. 2d 1296 (Fla.3d DCA 1986), rev. denied, 506 So. 2d 1042 (Fla.1987); Hill v. State, 459 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). Affirmed.…
-
J.G. v. State, 544 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)…t’s guilt....” Molina v. State, 406 So. 2d 57 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (quoting Postell v. State, 398 So. 2d 851, 854 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 411 So. 2d 384 (Fla.1981)), constituted harmless error under the circumstances of this case. Hill v. State, 459 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). Thus, we affirm the adjudication for burglary and criminal mischief. However, the record does not support the adjudication for grand theft. The state did not present evidence establishing that the market value of the property was…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Postell v. State, 398 So. 2d 851 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
- Molina v. State, 406 So. 2d 57 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)