VICTOR ANTHONY HULSE-GUERRERO, PETITIONER,
v.
IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a recent statutory amendment mooted the appeal and remanded the case for the petitioner to apply for discretionary relief under the new law.
The petitioner, a native of British Honduras, was denied discretionary relief for adjustment of immigration status because he was a native of the West…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Adjustment Of Status cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
The petitioner, Victor Anthony HulseGuerrero, a native and citizen of British Honduras, appeals from a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals which denied his requests for discretionary relief under 8 U.S.C. §§ 1251(f), 1254(e), and 1255.
Under former section 245(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1255(a), the status of certain aliens could be adjusted by the Attorney General in his discretion. However, section 245(c), 8 U.S.C. § 1255(c), provided:
“The provisions of this section shall not be applicable to any alien who is a native of any country of the Western Hemisphere . . . .”
Thus, as a native of British Honduras and therefore a native of a country of the Western Hemisphere, appellant-petitioner was statutorily ineligible for adjustment of status. The Board of Immigration Appeals relied upon this exclusion in denying him discretionary relief.
On October 20, 1976, while this case was on appeal, the Congress of the United States enacted Public Law No. 94-571, 90 Stat. 2703, which became effective on January 1, 1977. This law abolishes the distinction in treatment of aliens under section 245(c) and makes adjustment of status by the Attorney General equally available to natives of both the Western and Eastern Hemispheres. Petitioner is now entitled to apply for this discretionary relief.
Because a grant of status adjustment would moot all the issues on appeal, we remand the case to the Board of Immigration Appeals to allow time to permit petitioner to make an application for status adjustment and for a decision by the Board thereafter in the light of Public Law No. 94-571 and the application. In the event no application is filed within 30 days, or in the event the application is denied, the present decision of the Board shall stand affirmed.