JASON EDWARD BRYANT, ETC., APPELLANTS,
v.
DUVAL COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY, ET AL., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
In this medical malpractice appeal, Dr. Alfonso Bremer, a staff physician at University Hospital, sought immunity under Florida's governmental tort immunity statute for alleged negligence in leaving an endotracheal tube inserted for nineteen days, causing a child's laryngeal stenosis. The court affirmed summary judgment, holding that Dr. Bremer qualifies for governmental immunity as an employee of the state subdivision (University Hospital), despite receiving supplemental compensation from a tax-exempt fund.
Dr. Bremer is entitled to governmental tort immunity under section 768.28(9)(a) as an employee of University Hospital, a state subdivision, because no employer-employee relationship exists between him and the Fund. The statute is constitutional, and absent allegations of bad faith, malice, or willful and wanton conduct, Dr. Bremer has personal immunity for ordinary negligence within the scope of his employment.
[1] A physician employed by a hospital authority, whose salary is supplemented by a tax-exempt corporation supporting medical education, is considered an employee of the hosp…
[2] Statutory immunity for state employees from tort liability for ordinary negligence within the scope of employment applies unless the actions are outside the scope of empl…
Previewing 2 of 6 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“the essential element was the right of control; the least determinative was the payment of wages”
Establishes the primary test for determining employer-employee relationships under common law, which the court applied to reject appellants' argument that the Fund was Dr. Bremer's employer.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceDr. Bremer was the attending physician for Jason Bryant in 1980 and was employed full-time as a staff physician by the Duval County Hospital Authority…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Right Of Control cases and more on FLexlaw
JOANOS, Judge.
In this appeal from a summary final judgment in a medical malpractice action appellants contend that Dr. Alfonso Bremer should not be afforded immunity under section 768.28(9)(a), Florida Statutes (1981). We disagree and affirm.
In their complaint, appellants alleged that Dr. Bremer’s negligence in leaving an endotrachael tube inserted for nineteen days caused Jason Bryant’s stenosis of the larynx and vocal cords. It was alleged that the alleged negligence was committed in the course and scope of Dr. Bremer’s employment with the University Hospital Academic Fund (Fund), a tax-exempt, private corporation which supports medical education by providing specialists for Jacksonville area hospitals.
Dr. Bremer, chairman of neurosurgery at University Hospital, was Jason Bryant’s attending physician in 1980. As a full-time staff physician employed by the Duval County Hospital Authority, d/b/a University Hospital, Dr. Bremer’s base salary is paid by University Hospital and supplemented by the Fund. The Fund provides billing services for physicians, collecting upon patients’ bills and using the income for medical education services. The primary source of income is from private and insured patients. Part of the money is used to supplement the base salary paid by the hospital. There is, however, no relationship between the number of patients treated and an individual physician’s supplement from the Fund. Dr. Bremer’s total salary was determined when he was hired by University Hospital. He received no monies from other sources for his professional services.
While undisputed that Dr. Bremer is a staff physician at University Hospital, appellants argue that his relationship with the Fund is in the nature of employee and employer and precludes his asserting the immunity afforded by section 768.28(9)(a), Florida Statutes (1981). Section 768.-28(9)(a) provides that no employee of the state or its subdivisions is personally liable in tort for ordinary negligence in the scope of his employment. A state employee is personally liable for actions outside the scope of his employment or for actions in bad faith, with malice or with willful and wanton disregard of human rights, safety or property. Examining the record, we find nothing which would indicate an employee and employer relationship exists between Dr. Bremer and the Fund. Common law considerations in determining the existence of an employer and employee relationship were the selection and engagement of the servant, the payment of wages, the power of dismissal, and the right of control over the servant’s conduct. The essential element was the right of control; the least determinative was the payment of wages. 2 Fla.Jur.2d 297, Agency and Employment § 121. While Dr. Bremer received supplemental salary and other benefits from the Fund, no allegation or evidence shows that the Fund was involved in selecting and hiring him, that the Fund has the power to dismiss him, or, most importantly, that the Fund has a right of control over Dr. Bremer’s conduct. Under the facts of this case, we can find no genuine issue as to Dr. Bremer’s employee status with University Hospital which would preclude summary judgment. Absent an allegation of bad faith, malice, or willful and wanton actions, Dr. Bremer would be personally immune for ordinary negligence within the scope of his employment with University Hospital. White v. Hillsborough County Hospital Authority, 448 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1983).
Appellants next argue that section 768.28(9)(a) is unconstitutional as applied in this case. As reflected in the trial court’s order, the constitutionality of section 768.-28(9) has been recognized. State, Department of Transportation v. Knowles, 402 So. 2d 1155 (Fla.1981); White, supra. We concur in the Second District Court of Appeal’s decision in the White case and see nothing in this case to take it out from under that determination of constitutionality.
Accordingly, the summary final judgment is AFFIRMED.
WIGGINTON and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jaar v. The Univ. OF Miami, 474 So. 2d 239 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)…liability in this cause. Florida courts have ruled the immunity statute constitutional when applied to a physician who, within the scope of his governmental employment, negligently caused injury to another. Bryant v. Duval County Hospital Authority, 459 So. 2d 1154 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); White v. Hillsborough County Hospital Authority, 448 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 2d DCA), cause dismissed, 443 So. 2d 981 (Fla.1983). The next issue presented for determination is whether sovereign immu [*245] nity applies to limit the Univ…1 / 2
-
State v. Koch, 582 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)…employee; it merely required that the action be maintained against the public employer as the sole, substitute defendant. White v. Hillsborough County Hospital Authority, 448 So. 2d 2, 3 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Bryant v. Duval County Hospital Authority, 459 So. 2d 1154, 1155 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). In White v. Hillsborough County Hospital Authority, supra at 3, the court specifically stated that with regard to a state employee’s simple negligence, the injured person’s “cause of action has not been destroyed but has b…
-
Pub. Health Tr. OF Dade Cnty. v. Geter, 613 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)…y offered by the plaintiff, Dr. Saunders was acting solely in his capacity as an employee of the defendant Public [*127] Health Trust in providing the complained-of medical services to the plaintiffs decedent. See Bryant v. Duval County Hosp. Auth., 459 So. 2d 1154 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Maguire v. American Family Life Assur. Co., 442 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), rev. denied, 451 So. 2d 849 (Fla.1984); Jones v. City of Hialeah, 368 So. 2d 398 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 378 So. 2d 346 (Fla.1979). As to the…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- State v. Knowles, 402 So. 2d 1155 (Fla. 1981)
- White v. Hillsborough Cnty. Hosp. Auth. & John L. Vanderschilden, M.D., 448 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)