CURVIN J. TRONE, JR., TRUSTEE FOR WESTGATE CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
C. ARNHOLT SMITH ET AL., DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS
Despite the implications in Cord v. Smith, 338 F. 2d 516 (9th Cir. 1964), we conclude that 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) is not the proper avenue by which to obtain review of the district court’s denial of a motion to disqualify an attorney for conflict of interest. See Silver Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 496 F. 2d 800 (2d Cir. 1974) (in banc). See also Melamed v. ITT Continental Baking Co., 534 F. 2d 82 (6th Cir. 1976); Draganescu v. First National Bank of Hollywood, 502 F. 2d 550 (5th Cir. 1974). We therefore deny permission to appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). The accompanying motion for a stay of further proceedings is denied without prejudice.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Armstrong v. Clovis McALPIN, 625 F.2d 433 (2d Cir. 1980)
-
NEW Orleans Pub. Serv., Inc. v. United GAS Pipe Line Co., 732 F.2d 452 (5th Cir. 1984)
-
Curvin J. Trone v. Smith, 621 F.2d 994 (9th Cir. 1980)
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Silver Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corp. & Chrysler Realty Corp., 496 F.2d 800 (2d Cir. 1974)
- Cord v. Smith, 338 F.2d 516 (9th Cir. 1964)
- Ioana Draganescu v. First Nat'l Bank OF Hollywood, 502 F.2d 550 (5th Cir. 1974)
- Maynard B. Melamed in Bankr. for Laub Baking Co. v. ITT Cont'l Baking Co., 534 F.2d 82 (6th Cir. 1976)