HAROLD SILVER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
PER CURIAM:
Appellant is attempting to appeal an order of the district court which remanded his suit to expunge two unfavorable fitness reports from his service record back to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records. The district court has retained jurisdiction of the suit.
However, this Court has no jurisdiction to entertain this appeal and we must dismiss. The district court's order of October 8,1975, remanding this case to the Board is not dispositive of this litigation, and is not a final order as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Nor may the district court’s order be considered an interlocutory decision under either paragraphs (a) or (b) in 28 U.S.C. § 1292. The order does not grant, continue, modify, refuse, or dissolve an injunction, and the district court has not certified the order to us as involving a controlling question of law about which there is difference of opinion. See Pauls v. Secretary of Air Force, 1 Cir. 1972, 457 F. 2d 294, 297-298.
DISMISSED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Evans, 572 F.2d 455 (5th Cir. 1978)
-
Hameetman v. The City OF Chicago, 776 F.2d 636 (7th Cir. 1985)
-
Graphic Commc'ns Union v. Chicago Tribune Co. & Chicago Newspaper Publishers' Ass'n, 779 F.2d 13 (7th Cir. 1985)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Isbell Enters., Inc. v. Citizens Cas. Co. OF NEW York, 431 F.2d 409 (5th Cir. 1970)
- Pauls v. The Sec'y OF the AIR Force, 457 F.2d 294 (1st Cir. 1972)