CARTER H. OGDEN, ZELMA OGDEN AND DOROTHY OGDEN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE; E. B. OGDEN, JR. AND NANCY A. OGDEN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Action For Refund Of Taxes cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The district court dismissed for lack of jurisdiction the taxpayers’ actions for refund of income taxes alleged to be due by virtue of deductions claimed for certain losses resulting from expropriation of their property by the Cuban government. See Ogden et al. v. United States, S.D.Miss. 1977, 432 F.Supp. 214.1
Perusal of the record and the briefs of the parties, followed by oral argument, persuades us that the trial court correctly determined that the claims for refund were time-barred under Section 165 of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. § 165.
AFFIRMED.
. The district court’s opinion and order of dismissal are also reported at 37 A.F.T.R.2d 409.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Klein, 560 F.2d 1236 (5th Cir. 1977)
-
United States v. Stober, 604 F.2d 1274 (10th Cir. 1979)
-
United States v. Cannon, 778 F.2d 747 (11th Cir. 1985)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence