NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER,
v.
GRAY-GRIMES TOOL COMPANY, INC., RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the Board's decision was supported by substantial evidence, but modified the remedy regarding backpay.
The National Labor Relations Board sought enforcement of its order finding a company violated the Act by closing a plant without bargaining with the u…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Back Pay Remedy cases and more on FLexlaw
The National Labor Relations Board applies for enforcement of its order reported at 221 N.L.R.B. 736. Reference is made to the decision of the Board for a recitation of pertinent facts.
The Board found that the Company violated § 8(a)(3) and (1) of the Act in the particulars set forth in its reported decision. The Company also was found to have violated § 8(a)(5) and (1) by not giving the union an opportunity to bargain about the effect on the workers of the closing of Gray-Grimes. Among other things the Company was required to bargain collectively with the Union about the effects of its closing and to pay back wages to Gray-Grimes employees from the date of the closing.
We conclude that the decision of the Board is supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole, but that the remedy should be modified to provide for payment of backpay to employees only from the date the union shall request the Company to bargain about the effects of the closing on the workers to the time an agreement shall be reached or a bona fide impasse shall occur. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that paragraph 2(b) of the Board’s order be modified to read as follows:
(b) Pay the Gray-Grimes employees backpay, at the rate of their normal wages when last in Respondent’s employ, from the date the Union shall request the Respondent to bargain on those subjects pertaining to the effects of the plant closing on its employees until (1) an agreement shall be reached; or (2) until a bona fide impasse in bargaining; or (3) until the Union fails to commence negotiations after its request for bargaining or to bargain in good faith. If Respondent decides to resume its Gray-Grimes operation and offers to reinstate its employees to their same or substantially equivalent positions, its liability will cease as of that date. Backpay will be based on the earnings including fringe benefits which the employees normally would have received during the applicable period less any net interim earnings and shall be computed on a quarterly basis in the manner set forth in F.W. Woolworth Company, 90 N.L.R.B. 289, with interest thereon. Isis Plumbing & Heating Co., 138 N.L.R.B. 716.
It is further ORDERED that the order of the Board, as herein modified, be and hereby is enforced. No costs are taxed. Each party will bear its own costs in this court.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Penntech Papers, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 706 F.2d 18 (1st Cir. 1983)
-
VAN Dorn Plastic Mach. Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 736 F.2d 343 (6th Cir. 1984)