PRESTRESSED SYSTEMS, INC. AND CLAIMS CENTER, APPELLANTS/CROSS-APPELLEES,

v.

JAMES E. GOFF, AND DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION, APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTS

Citator

Cited By

• Prestressed Sys. & Claims Ctr. v. Goff, 486 So. 2d 1378 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)
  …he court per curiam affirmed an award of nursing or attendant care payments in the amount of $200 per week to claimant’s mother, during the time that claimant was domiciled at his mother’s home receiving such care. Prestressed Systems, Inc. v. Goff, 461 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). The deputy’s earlier order also reserved jurisdiction for the purpose of later determining whether claimant’s attorney was entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees, by reason of the employer/servicing agent’s (e/s/a’s) bad faith i…
• Perez v. Pennsuco Cement & Aggregates & Ins. Co. of N. Am., 504 So. 2d 1274 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)
  …r him, other than testimony by the wife that she fixed his lunch. The E/C also argues that it was error for the deputy commissioner to make an attendant care award for the time Perez spent in the hospital based on Prestressed Systems, Inc. v. Goff, 461 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). The time period involved is from 20 September 1982 until 5 October 1982. In his brief, Perez concedes the award allowed for this time is erroneous. According to Walt Disney World Co. v. Harrison, 443 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 1st DCA 19…
• Rowe v. State, 523 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988)
  …should be vacated because it was founded in a material mistake of fact and law. We cannot agree. It is true that a claim of ineffective counsel can be predicated upon erroneous advice in the sentencing guidelines context. See, e.g., Lucas v. State, 461 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). The failure to object to known scoresheet miscalculations might qualify as ineffective assistance if the defendant is prejudiced by counsel’s omission. Pettway v. State, 502 So. 2d 1353 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). However, as with any o…