DONALD PATRICK EWING, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1984-11-21
No. 84-444
SCHEB, A.C.J., and OTT and LEHAN, JJ., concur.
461 So. 2d 966 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1984)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted and sentenced for trafficking in cocaine and possession of a controlled substance. He raises three grounds on appeal, only one of which merits comment. Defendant argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained from a search of an automobile. We have previously rejected this argument in Hendrix v. State, 456 So. 2d 494 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), a case involving the same automobile and evidence as in this case. We have examined the other grounds raised by defendant and find them to be without merit.

Accordingly, we affirm defendant’s convictions and sentences.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and OTT and LEHAN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw