CARTER REALTY COMPANY, ETC., ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
ROPER BROS. LAND CO., INC., ETC., APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Carter Realty appeals a venue ruling in a breach of contract action for unpaid sales commission. The court affirmed venue in Orange County, holding that when no place of payment is specified in a contract for money, the breach occurs where the creditor's office for customary business is located.
Venue is proper in Orange County, where Roper Bros. (the creditor) maintains its office for customary business. The breach of the contract to pay money occurs where the debtor was obligated to pay, and absent an express agreement on place of payment, the debtor must seek the creditor at the creditor's residence or place of customary business.
[1] The venue for a breach of contract action is in the county where the cause of action accrued.
[2] A cause of action for breach of contract accrues where the defendant fails to perform the covenant allegedly breached.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The venue of a cause of action for breach of contract is in the county where the cause of action accrued. The cause of action for breach of contract accrues where the alleged breach occurs.”
Establishes the fundamental venue rule for contract breach actions
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceCarter Realty (based in Polk County) and Roper Bros. (based in Orange County) entered into an oral cooperation agreement whereby Roper Bros. would sha…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Place Of Payment cases and more on FLexlaw
COWART, Judge.
This case involves venue in an action for breach of a contract provision for the payment of money where no place of payment is specified.
Both parties are real estate brokerage firms. Carter Realty, whose office for transaction of its customary business is in Polk County, Florida, had a brokerage agreement to sell land in Polk County. Carter Realty orally agreed to share the sales commission with Roper Bros., whose office for transaction of its customary business is in Orange County, Florida, if Roper Bros., as a cooperating broker, procured a purchaser. The parties did not agree as to the place of payment of any money that might become due to Roper Bros, under the oral cooperation agreement. Roper Bros, procured a purchaser and the resulting sales contract was executed in Polk County and the land sale was closed there at which time Carter Realty collected the whole sales commission. Roper Bros, filed an action in Grange County against Carter Realty for its agreed share of the sale commission. The trial court denied Carter Realty’s claim of improper venue and Carter Realty appeals.
Notwithstanding the fact that the commission paid by the owner to Carter Realty was created by the land sale contract that occurred in Polk County and notwithstanding all other factors relating to Polk County, this action is on the debt that Carter Realty allegedly owes Roper Bros, as the result of Roper Bros, performance under the oral coorporation agreement. Without regard to where the original brokerage agreement may have obligated the land owner to pay the brokerage commission to Carter Realty, the money allegedly due Roper Bros, is under the oral cooperation agreement between the parties to this action and there was no express agreement as to where that money was to be paid when due.
The venue of a cause of action for breach of contract is in the county where the cause of action accrued.1 The cause of action for breach of contract accrues where the alleged breach occurs. The breach occurs where the defendant fails to perform the covenant allegedly breached. Where the alleged breach is a failure of a defendant to pay money due under the contract the breach occurs where the defendant was obligated to pay and deliver the money. Money due under a contract creates a debt-or-creditor relationship between the par ties. If no place of payment is agreed on, the debtor must seek the creditor and the money due is deemed payable at the creditor’s residence or office where it transacts its customary business. See Saf-T-Clean, Inc. v. Martin-Marietta Corp., 197 So. 2d 8 (Fla.1967); Williams v. Aeroland Oil Company, 155 Fla. 114, 20 So. 2d 346 (1944); Baruch v. W.B. Haggerty, Inc., 137 Fla. 799, 188 So. 797 (1939); Croker v. Powell, 115 Fla. 733, 156 So. 146 (1934); Crescent Beach, Inc. v. Jarvis, 435 So. 2d 396 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Excel Ins. Co. v. Brown, 406 So. 2d 534 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). See also Windsor v. Migliaccio, 399 So. 2d 65 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Sheffield Steel Products, Inc. v. Powell Brothers, Inc., 385 So. 2d 161 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), review denied 392 So. 2d 1378 (Fla.1980).
Carter Realty cites St. Laurent v. Resort Marketing Assoc., Inc., 399 So. 2d 362 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981), and Knowles v. Imperial Lumber Company, Inc., 238 So. 2d 487 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970). The breach in St. Laurent allegedly occurred when the defendant renounced a partially completed service contract by ordering the plaintiffs employees to cease performing under the contract. That action sought damages for loss of future profit and recovery of commissions and other sums due on sales already completed. In St. Laurent the agreement provided a place of payment for the money owed, and therefore is distinguishable from the instant case. In Knowles the defendant general contractor did not breach an agreement to pay money due the plaintiff materialman, who was a material supplier to a subcontractor. The defendant general contractor allegedly breached an agreement with the material-man plaintiff to make progress payments due the subcontractor on the subcontract, by checks payable jointly to the subcontractor and the plaintiff materialman. That alleged breach occurred when and where the general contractor made and delivered the progress payment checks to the subcontractor alone.
AFFIRMED.
ORFINGER and SHARP, JJ., concur. . See § 47.011, Fla.Stat.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (17 total)
-
AIR S., Inc. v. Spaziano, 547 So. 2d 314 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)…as filed not 1984 when the crash landing occurred. During 1988 appellant did not maintain an office in Broward County. Venue for a breach of contract claim accrues in the county where the breach occurs. Carter Realty Co. v. Roper Brothers Land Co., 461 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). Although appellees allege the contract breach took place in Broward County when appellant failed to furnish a safe plane and skilled pilot, the breach of contract claim accrued when the plane crashed. See Soowal v. Marden, 452 S…
-
Nat'l Equip. Leasing, Inc. v. Watkins, 471 So. 2d 1369 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985)…y is deemed payable at the creditor’s residence or office where it transacts its customary business, and it is there the cause of action accrues for breach of contract for failure to pay the money. See Carter Realty Co. v. Roper Bros. Land Co. Inc., 461 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). However, the point is not why or how the money that the action seeks to recover is due in Florida but whether the fact that money due in Florida is not paid is a constitutionally sufficient minimum contact in this state. Therefo…
-
Precision Software, Inc. v. Gauthier, 605 So. 2d 592 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)…breach of contract is said to have accrued in the county where the breach occurred. Pearson v. Wallace Aviation, Inc., 400 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Soowal v. Marden, 452 So. 2d 625 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Carter Realty Co. v. Roper Bros. Land Co., 461 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); United Bank of Pinellas v. Farmers Bank of Malone, 511 So. 2d 1078 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). A breach is said to have occurred where failure of performance occurred. Speedling, Inc. v. Krig, 378 So. 2d 57 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Vital In…
Previewing 3 of 17 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited (12 total)
- Williams v. Aeroland OIL Co., 155 Fla. 114 (Fla. 1944)
- Simmons v. State, 115 Fla. 733 (Fla. 1934)
- Jung H. Moon v. Ima-Park Place, LLC (Fla. 3d DCA 2021)
- James A. Knowles, Inc. v. Imperial Lumber Co., Inc., 238 So. 2d 487 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970)
- Sailing W. Baruch v. W. B. Haggerty, Inc., 137 Fla. 799 (Fla. 1939)
- Windsor v. Crescent A. Migliaccio, 399 So. 2d 65 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)
- Saf-T-Clean, Inc. v. Martin-Marietta Corp., 197 So. 2d 8 (Fla. 1967)
- Crescent Beach, Inc. v. Jarvis, 435 So. 2d 396 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)
- ST. Laurent v. Resort Mktg. Assocs., Inc., 399 So. 2d 362 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981)
- Excel Ins. Co. v. Brown, 406 So. 2d 534 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)