THE EDWARD B. FREEMAN CO., PETITIONER,
v.
ROXINE FAGEN, DANIEL FAGEN, HER HUSBAND; MARINE WAREHOUSE, INC., AND AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY, RESPONDENTS

Fla. 4th DCA | 1985-01-16
No. 84-2333
HERSEY, HURLEY and BARKETT, JJ„ concur.
461 So. 2d 1038 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1985) Negative Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari petitioners ask this court to review the trial court’s order in this personal injury action allowing inquiry into the valuation of defendant’s ownership interest in certain business property.

Inasmuch as respondents are not seeking punitive damages, and since they have made no showing that the sought-after information is relevant to this litigation, we grant the writ and quash the trial court’s order on the authority of Equifax Corporation v. Cooper, 380 So. 2d 514 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), and Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.280(b)(1).

HERSEY, HURLEY and BARKETT, JJ„ concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Hartford Accident & Indem. Co. v. U.S.C.P. Co., 515 So. 2d 998 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
    …nd [*1001] without the discovery question presented in Allstate Insurance Company v. Gibbs, we accepted certiorari jurisdiction and quashed orders denying motions to dismiss in Home Insurance Company of Illinois v. Sentry Insurance A Mutual Company, 461 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985) and Canadian Home Insurance Company v. Norris, 471 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). However, more recently in Doerschuck v. Doerschuck, 481 So. 2d 1317 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), we reverted to the view expressed in Chalfonte and denied…
    1 / 2
  • State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Nail, 516 So. 2d 1022 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987)
    …less and until they obtain a judgment against Nail. See Continental Casualty Company v. Marx, 480 So. 2d 177, 178 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), review dismissed, 484 So. 2d 9 (Fla.1986); Home Insurance Company of Illinois v. Sentry Insurance A Mutual Company, 461 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). Moreover, State Farm states that the issues and parties in the two suits are not common. State Farm is no longer a party in the action filed by the Slatterys, and the Slatterys are not parties to State Farm’s action for declarat…
  • Hazen v. Allstate Ins. Co., 952 So. 2d 531 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)
    …njured third party had no right of action against the insurer under a liability policy before obtaining a judgment against the insured.4 See Hett v. Madison Mut. Ins. Co., 621 So. 2d 764, 766 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Home Ins. Co. of Ill. v. Sentry Ins., 461 So. 2d 1038, 1038 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), receded from on other grounds, Hartford Accident & Indem. Co. v. U.S.C.P. Co., 515 So. 2d 998 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). The procedural effect of the 1982 version of the statute was to require a two-step process for an injured t…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw