UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
MARINO J. MATURO, APPELLANT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court affirmed the judgment of conviction for appellant Maturo.
Appellant Maturo, along with co-defendants, was convicted of conspiracy. The appellants filed a joint brief requesting their findings apply to all.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appellate Review Of Criminal Convictions cases and more on FLexlaw
Opinion for the court PER CURIAM.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant’s brief, filed jointly with Louis P. and Anthony V. Vecchiarello in Nos. 76-1920 and 1921, decided today, 187 U.S. App.D.C. -, 569 F. 2d 656 (1977) requests:
It is respectfully submitted that this Court permit its findings to apply to all appellants to the same extent as if such appellant separately raised the combined specific issues herein. The three criminal cases have made each appellant responsible, as a conspirator, for the acts of each other as inseparable defendants. It is to be noted that a conspirator is liable to the same extent as the principal. Then, by the same reasoning process each co-conspirator should fare no less [well] should the principal be successful in his appeal.
Appellants’ Brief p. 61.
We have acceded to this request and have fully and separately considered the facts and issues as they involve appellant Maturo individually, as well as the facts and the issues which involve Maturo with the Vec-ehiarellos, individually and collectively. Our conclusion is that no contention which involves Maturo individually may be successfully maintained, and that all contentions which involve Maturo with any issue advanced by either or both Vecchiarellos are all lacking in merit. We therefore affirm the judgment of conviction of Marino J. Maturo on authority of the court’s opinion filed today in Nos. 76-1920, 1921, 187 U.S.App.D.C.--, 569 F. 2d 656 (1977).
Judgment accordingly.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (22 total)
-
Evers v. Gen. Motors Corp., 770 F.2d 984 (11th Cir. 1985)
-
Admiral Theatre Corp. v. The Douglas Theatre Co., 585 F.2d 877 (8th Cir. 1978)
Previewing 3 of 22 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- United States v. Vecchiarello, 569 F.2d 656 (D.C. Cir. 1977)