JACKSONVILLE SHIPYARDS, INC., AND AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, PETITIONERS,
v.
HERBERT L. PERDUE AND DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, RESPONDENTS; P. C. PFEIFFER COMPANY AND TEXAS EMPLOYERS' INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, PETITIONERS, V. DIVERSON FORD AND DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, RESPONDENTS; AYERS STEAMSHIP COMPANY AND TEXAS EMPLOYERS' INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, PETITIONERS, V. WILL BRYANT AND DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, RESPONDENTS
JACKSONVILLE SHIPYARDS, INC., AND AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, PETITIONERS,
HERBERT L. PERDUE AND DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, RESPONDENTS; P. C. PFEIFFER COMPANY AND TEXAS EMPLOYERS' INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, PETITIONERS, V. DIVERSON FORD AND DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, RESPONDENTS; AYERS STEAMSHIP COMPANY AND TEXAS EMPLOYERS' INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, PETITIONERS, V. WILL BRYANT AND DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, RESPONDENTS
575 F.2d 79
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1978)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 13 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
These Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-950 (1970) (amended 1972), cases1 are on remand from the Supreme Court with instructions to reconsider them in light of Northeast Marine Terminal Co., Inc. v. Ca-puto, 432 U.S. 249, 97 S.Ct. 2348, 53 L.Ed.2d 320 (1977). We find that our prior resolution of the coverage issues presented in each of these cases is consistent with the rationale expressed in Caputo, and, accordingly, we reaffirm our prior determinations as to the benefit eligibility of the affected maritime employees under the Act.
. Five cases are contained in the decision of this court in Jacksonville Shipyards, Inc. v. Perdue, 539 F. 2d 533 (5th Cir. 1976). The three cases involved in the present remand are Jacksonville Shipyards, Inc. v. Perdue (No. 75-1659), vacated and remanded, 433 U.S. 904, 97 S.Ct. 2967, 53 L.Ed.2d 1088 (1977); and Ayers Steamship Co. v. Bryant (No. 75-4112), which was consolidated with P. C. Pfeiffer Co. v. Ford (No. 75-2289), vacated and remanded, 433 U.S. 904, 97 S.Ct. 2966, 53 L.Ed.2d 1088 (1977).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (12 total)
-
P. C. Pfeiffer Co., Inc. v. Ford, 444 U.S. 69 (U.S. 1979)
-
Dir., Off. of Workers' Comp. Programs, United States Dep't of Labor v. Perini N. River Assocs., 459 U.S. 297 (U.S. 1983)
-
Odom Constr. Co., Inc. v. United States Dep't OF Labor & Dir., 622 F.2d 110 (5th Cir. 1980)
Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Ne. Marine Terminal Co., Inc. v. Caputo, 432 U.S. 249 (U.S. 1977)
- Jacksonville Shipyards, Inc. v. Perdue, 539 F.2d 533 (5th Cir. 1976)
- Barker v. North Carolina, 433 U.S. 904 (U.S. 1977)
- Adkins v. I. T. O. Corp. of Baltimore, 433 U.S. 904 (U.S. 1977)