JOHN SOLIZ, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Murphy v. State, 464 So. 2d 608 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …plea was never entered, there is no basis, as the state now contends, for requiring a Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 motion to set such a plea aside in the trial court. On these facts, therefore, the circuit court was required by A.E.K., accord, C.S. v. State, 462 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 3d DCA, 1985), to reverse the judgment under review before it, rather than dismiss the appeal. It is directed to do so after remand. Certiorari granted.…
• J.N. v. State, 483 So. 2d 885 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
  …d] was informed of and knowingly and intelligently waived the constitutional rights normally incident to a trial.” A.E.K. v. State, 432 So. 2d 720, 720-21 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); accord Murphy v. State, 464 So. 2d 608 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); C.S. v. State, 462 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). The underlying justification for this rule is that the constitutional requirements for taking a guilty or nolo contendere plea, as established in Boykin, may not be indirectly subverted through a stipulation by defense counsel to…
• M.C. v. State, 561 So. 2d 461 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
  …second adjudication and remand the matter so that, by plea colloquy, the court may determine whether the juvenile freely, knowingly, and voluntarily tendered his nolo contendere plea. C.W. v. State, 554 So. 2d 28, (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); C.S. v. State, 462 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Fla.R.Juv.P. 8.130(a)(1). See also J.N. v. State, 483 So. 2d 885 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (proceedings tantamount to nolo contendere plea required inquiry into whether juvenile freely, knowingly, and intelligently waived his attendant…

Authorities Cited

• Tibbs v. Florida, 457 U.S. 31 (U.S. 1982)
• Delbert Lee Tibbs v. State, 397 So. 2d 1120 (Fla. 1981)