SECURITY BARGE LINE, INC., A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
MARIA GRACIELA MCCRAY, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES MANLY MCCRAY, DECEASED, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE

5th Cir. | 1978-10-11
No. 77-2543
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, COLEMAN and VANCE, Circuit Judges.
582 F.2d 13 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1978)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court affirmed the district court's judgment, finding the vessel's unseaworthiness caused the seaman's death and awarding damages to his survivors.


Facts & Procedural History

A barge line sued a deceased seaman's estate for vessel damage from a fire, alleging the seaman's negligence caused it. The estate counterclaimed, all…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

In this admiralty case, Security Barge Line, Inc. sued the estate of its seaman employee, James Manly McCray, for damages to its vessel, the M/V Washington, caused by an engine room fire. The barge line alleged that McCray, who was killed in the blaze, negligently caused the fire. McCray’s widow, as administratrix of his estate, counterclaimed against the barge line, claiming that the barge line’s negligence and the unseaworthiness of its vessel caused decedent’s death.

The district court found that the barge line failed to prove that McCray was negligent or that his acts had caused the fire. It concluded that although the cause of the fire was unknown decedent’s death resulted from the vessel’s unseaworthiness. Damages of $250,000.00 were awarded to McCray’s survivors.

On appeal, the barge line attacks the lower court’s findings specifically contending, (1) that the district court erred in its holding that the M/V Washington was unseaworthy; (2) that the district court erred in ignoring uncontradicted evidence of negligence on the part of the decedent McCray, and (3) that the district court erred in its assessment of damages.

In his memorandum opinion of July 8, 1977 Chief Judge Keady painstakingly considered each of these contentions. Based upon the findings of facts and conclusions of law as embodied in his opinion, we affirm the district court’s judgment.

■ AFFIRMED.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw