IN RE THE ESTATE OF HAROLD HAYWARD, DECEASED

Fla. 4th DCA | 1985-02-06
No. 84-1884
ANSTEAD, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.
463 So. 2d 446 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1985) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The personal representative for the estate of Harold Hayward brings this non-final appeal which challenges an order of the probate court denying a motion to suppress the deposition of Elnor Hayward. This matter does not come within the categories authorized by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a) to be treated as a non-final appeal. We elect to treat this non-final appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.040(c).

Certiorari will only be granted when a party demonstrates both a departure from the essential requirements of law and the lack of an adequate remedy by appeal. See USF & G v. Graham, 404 So. 2d 863 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Lindsey v. Sherman, 402 So. 2d 1349 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). The personal representative has an adequate remedy by appeal. Accordingly, the writ of certiorari is denied.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Lawnwood Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Perry R. Lloyd, III, M.D., 773 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)
    …e not presently reviewable. They are similar to a denial of a motion in limine. Such rulings are not covered by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3), which enumerates the non-final orders which are appealable. See In re Estate of Hayward, 463 So. 2d 446 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). Also, the rulings are not reviewable through certiorari because an adequate remedy is available through final appeal. See Bridges v. Bridges, 734 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Hayward, 463 So. 2d at 446. Accordingly, we dismis…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw