JACKSONVILLE SHIPYARDS, INC. AND AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, PETITIONERS,
v.
WILLIAM DUGGER AND DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, RESPONDENTS

5th Cir. | 1979-01-02
No. 78-2611
587 F.2d 197 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1979) Positive Treatment
Cited by 12 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the award of permanent total disability compensation was supported by substantial evidence and that the statutory schedule for specific member injuries was inapplicable.


Facts & Procedural History

William Dugger was awarded compensation for permanent total disability by an administrative law judge. Jacksonville Shipyards appealed this award.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner, Jacksonville Shipyards, appeals an award of compensation for permanent total disability to respondent, William Dugger, pursuant to section 8(a) of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C.A. § 908(a). We affirm the award, in accordance with the opinion below of the Benefits Review Board. Dugger v. Jacksonville Shipyards, BRB No. 77-692, June 30, 1978.

Substantial evidence supports the finding of the administrative law judge that Dugger has suffered permanent total disability. In so concluding, the administrative law judge properly took into account not only the claimant’s physical condition but also other factors such as age, education, industrial history, rehabilitative potential, and availability of work which the injured worker can do. See Watson v. Gulf Stevedore Corp., 5 Cir., 1968, 400 F. 2d 649, 653.

There is no merit to respondent’s contention that, because the injury itself is confined to one limb, Dugger’s recovery must be limited to that allowed under the schedule in section 8(c)(2) of the Act, 33 U.S.C. § 8(c)(2). In cases of permanent total disability, the schedules set forth in section 8(c) are inapplicable. In this case, the administrative law judge properly awarded compensation for permanent total disability pursuant to section 8(a), 33 U.S.C. § 908(a). See American Mutual Insurance Co. of Boston v. Jones, 1970, 138 U.S.App. D.C. 269, 272, 426 F. 2d 1263, 1266.

We have examined the case of Williams v. Donovan, E.D.La., 1964, 234 F.Supp. 135, aff’d 5 Cir., 1966, 367 F. 2d 825, and find it to be consistent with our holding here. In Williams, the claimant was suffering from a partial disability, resulting from an injury to a specific member, the leg, unlike the present case where the injury to a specific member has resulted in permanent total disability.

AFFIRMED.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw