UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, E. W. JONES, COMMANDER, NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY PATROL, JAKE ALEXANDER, SECRETARY, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND HIGHWAY SAFETY, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a subsequent Reorganization Plan restored the Attorney General's authority to initiate litigation under Title VII, requiring reversal of the dismissal.
The District Court dismissed the United States' suit against the North Carolina State Highway Patrol for alleged employment discrimination, finding th…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Reorganization Plan No. 1 Of 1978 cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
The District Court on December 30, 1976 dismissed this action of the United States by the Attorney General to restrain the North Carolina State Highway Patrol from engaging in a pattern or practice of discriminating against blacks and women in employment opportunities with the Highway Patrol, as forbidden by Section 707, Title VII, Civil Rights Act, as amended in 1972. 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2, 2000e-6(a). Basing his ruling on the statute as amended, the trial judge concluded that the Attorney General’s functions, having been transferred to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, his authority to bring the suit ceased. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-6(c). United States v. State of North Carolina, Civil Action No. 75-0328-Cir.-5 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 30, 1975).
However, since that decision the President — on February 23, 1978 — submitted to Congress, “Reorganization Plan No. 1 of 1978.” Section 5 of the Plan transfers to the Attorney General full and complete authority in the “initiation of litigation with respect to State or local government or political subdivisions” under Section 707 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-6. The Plan was approved by Congress and, by Executive Order of June 30, 1978, was made effective as of July 1, 1978.
Our duty is to apply the law as it is now written. Bradley v. School Board of the City of Richmond, 416 U.S. 696, 711, 94 S.Ct. 2006, 40 L.Ed.2d 476 (1974). The result will be to require reversal of the District Court’s dismissal for want of authority to bring the suit as well as a remand of the action for further consideration of all other issues.
Reversed and Remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. The City OF Miami, 664 F.2d 435 (5th Cir. 1981)
-
United States v. The City OF Miami, 614 F.2d 1322 (5th Cir. 1980)
-
United States v. Fresno Unified Sch. Dist., 592 F.2d 1088 (9th Cir. 1979)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Bradley v. Sch. Bd. of the City of Richmond, 416 U.S. 696 (U.S. 1974)