NICHOLS CHAROLAIS RANCH, INC., PERRY NICHOLS, INEZ NICHOLS AND PERRY NICHOLS, JR., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES,
v.
GERALD C. BARTON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT; GERALD C. BARTON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. NICHOLS CHAROLAIS RANCH, INC., PERRY NICHOLS, INEZ NICHOLS AND PERRY NICHOLS, JR., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
NICHOLS CHAROLAIS RANCH, INC., PERRY NICHOLS, INEZ NICHOLS AND PERRY NICHOLS, JR., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES,
GERALD C. BARTON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT; GERALD C. BARTON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. NICHOLS CHAROLAIS RANCH, INC., PERRY NICHOLS, INEZ NICHOLS AND PERRY NICHOLS, JR., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
587 F.2d 809
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1979)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
These cases, consolidated in the district court, arise from nearly identical fact situations and are controlled by the same principles of law. The facts and the governing legal rules are well stated in the opinion of the district court. Nichols Charolais Ranch, Inc. v. Barton, 460 F.Supp. 228. The decision of the district court is correct and its judgment is
AFFIRMED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Triano v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 565 So. 2d 748 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
-
Long v. Shultz Cattle Co., 881 F.2d 129 (5th Cir. 1989)
-
Gaylene D. Edison v. The Reliable Life Ins. Co., 664 F.2d 1130 (9th Cir. 1981)