RUTH TALIAFERRO AND B. PATRICIA DYSON, APPELLEES,
v.
HENRY I. WILLETT, JR., PRESIDENT, LONGWOOD COLLEGE; WILLIAM E. DANIEL, JR., LONGWOOD COLLEGE, APPELLANTS, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS, AMICUS CURIAE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A plaintiff deprived of procedural due process can only recover nominal damages absent proof of independent compensable injury.
College officials appealed a judgment awarding a tenured professor damages for premature retirement, alleging denial of procedural due process. The di…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Nominal Damages cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
The president and the rector of Long-wood College appeal a judgment awarding Ruth S. Taliaferro substantial compensatory damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 because the college wrongfully required her to retire prematurely from her tenured position. The district court concluded that the officials had denied Taliaferro procedural due process. Relying on our decisions in Thomas v. Ward, 529 F. 2d 916 (4th Cir. 1975), and Burt v. Board of Trustees, 521 F. 2d 1201 (4th Cir. 1975), the court found Taliaferro entitled to recover five years’ back pay.
In Carey v. Piphus, 435 U.S. 247, 259-60 and n. 15, 98 S.Ct. 1042, 55 L.Ed.2d 252 (1978), decided after the district court’s judgment in this case, the Supreme Court disapproved Thomas and Burt. Carey held that, absent proof of other compensable tort injury, a plaintiff deprived of procedural due process can recover only nominal damages.
As the district court noted in its memorandum opinion, the procedures to which a tenured professor is entitled prior to termination are not the main issue in this case. Taliaferro’s claim is essentially an action for contract damages arising from the al leged violation of a tenured professor’s right to teach until reaching the age of seventy. Neither here nor in the district court has she suggested that procedural deprivations caused her independent injury. In light of Carey, therefore, the controversy over the alleged breach of contract presents no substantial federal question. See Berry v. City of Portsmouth, 562 F. 2d 307 (4th Cir. 1977); Heath v. City of Fairfax, 542 F. 2d 1236, 1238 (4th Cir. 1976).
Consequently, the judgment of the district court is vacated, and the case is remanded with directions to dismiss for lack of a substantial federal question. We, of course, express no opinion on Taliaferro’s claim for compensatory damages. Each party shall bear its own costs.
Vacated and Remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wilson v. Taylor, 658 F.2d 1021 (5th Cir. 1981)
-
SAN Bernardino Physicians' Servs. Med. Grp., Inc. v. Cnty. OF SAN Bernardino, 825 F.2d 1404 (9th Cir. 1987)
-
Ramsey v. Bd. OF Educ. OF Whitley Cnty., 844 F.2d 1268 (6th Cir. 1988)
Authorities Cited
- Carey v. Piphus, 435 U.S. 247 (U.S. 1978)
- Burt v. The Bd. OF Trs. OF Edgefield Cnty. Sch. Dist., 521 F.2d 1201 (4th Cir. 1975)
- Lyell J. Thomlas v. Ward, 529 F.2d 916 (4th Cir. 1975)
- Heath v. City OF Fairfax, 542 F.2d 1236 (4th Cir. 1976)
- Berry v. The City OF Portsmouth, 562 F.2d 307 (4th Cir. 1977)