IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF RONALD WAYNE BEASLEY, APPELLANT,
v.
CORRIE GAIL BEASLEY, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appellate Review cases and more on FLexlaw
DAUKSCH, Judge.
This is an appeal in a marriage dissolution case. Although appellant presents a compelling argument for the reversal or modification of an alimony award he has not furnished this court with a transcript of the evidence taken at trial which led to the court’s decision. Financial affidavits, without supporting testimony, are not sufficient for our review of a case. Unless this court is provided with all of the evidence which was before the trial court, either by a transcript of testimony or a stipulated statement, then we cannot fault and reverse a trial judge for a purported error. Appeals such as this shall be subject to summary dismissal in the future, and motions for attorney’s fees pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes, will be favorably entertained.
AFFIRMED.
FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., and SHARP, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (15 total)
-
BEI v. Harper, 475 So. 2d 912 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)…fficiency of the evidence. Since we have not been provided with a record sufficient to review these points, either by transcript or stipulated statement, we cannot say the trial court erred in awarding damages to the Harpers. See Beasley v. Beasley, 463 So. 2d 1248 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Gordon v. Burke, 429 So. 2d 36 (Fla. 2d DCA), petition for review denied, 438 So. 2d 832 (Fla.1983); Starks. Finally, we think it appropriate to reiterate Judge Boardman’s admonition in Gordon. If a case is worthy of litigating…
-
Carter v. Carter, 504 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987)…itted by the rules is absolutely essential to an appellate review. The permissiveness of the rules is not in the necessity for a report of the proceedings, but in the method by which that report is presented. As we pointed out in Beasley v. Beasley, 463 So. 2d 1248 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985): Unless this court is provided with all of the evidence which was before the trial court, either by a transcript of testimony or a stipulated statement, then we cannot fault and reverse a trial judge for a purported error. It i…1 / 2
-
Chisholm v. Chisholm, 538 So. 2d 961 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)…cord below. Thomas, 498 So. 2d at 669. An appellate court has no obligation to afford the appellant a second opportunity to create an entire transcript because he ignored the rule when the record on appeal was being prepared. See Beasley v. Beasley, 463 So. 2d 1248 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). Finally, Copeland is of no help to appellant either. In that case, the appellants “made a conscientious effort to reconstruct the record.” 372 So. 2d at 1150. Appellant here has made no such effort. See Jackson v. State, 308 So…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 15 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence