LEE ROY WINTERS, APPELLANT,
v.
ANNA MARIA WINTERS, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1985-02-12
No. 84-2594
Before HENDRY, NESBITT and BAS-KIN, JJ.
464 So. 2d 200 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1985) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The record before us sufficiently demonstrates that the trial court abused its discretion in requiring the husband to pay attorneys’ fees in an amount well beyond his financial ability. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for reconsideration of the award of attorneys’ fees in accordance with the relative financial needs and abilities of the parties. See Cummings v. Cummings, 330 So. 2d 134 (Fla.1976); Travieso v. Travieso, 447 So. 2d 940 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Reversed and remanded.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Winters v. Winters, 491 So. 2d 1299 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
    …PER CURIAM. This case was previously before this court in Winters v. Winters, 464 So. 2d 200 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), wherein the husband appealed from the trial court’s order requiring him to pay $9,000 of the wife’s $11,000 of attorney’s fees. In reversing that order, we held that “the trial court abused its discretion in requiring the husband…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw