JOHN J. BURTON AND FLORIDA NATIONAL PROPERTIES, INC., APPELLANTS,
v.
SONOMA INTERNATIONAL, CLAUDETTE BRUCK, STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THOMAS G. WRIGHT, JR., APPELLEES

Fla. 4th DCA | 1985-02-20
No. 84-1061
HERSEY, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
464 So. 2d 217 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1985) Caution
Cited by 28 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to appellants’ rights to seek legal remedies, such as suits for trespass or nuisance, in the event the future use of the airport in question warrants such action.

HERSEY, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (14 total)

  • Chase v. Henkel & McCOY & Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 562 So. 2d 831 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
    …ize alternative chiropractic care, and the parties do not agree to a treating doctor, in a non-emergency situation it is the claimant’s burden to seek a decision through the judge or risk being required to pay the bill. Wackenhutt Corp. v. Freilich, 464 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). If the claimant fails to ask for a resolution of the deadlock, he is responsible for the charges up to the hearing. Id. With regard to the separate [*833] requirement upon the doctor to timely file reports, it has been held that…
  • …es cannot agree to a [non-emergency] treating physician ... it is the burden of the claimant to seek a decision through the deputy. Since the claimant failed to ask for resolution of the deadlocks, he is responsible....” Wackenhut Corp. v. Freilich, 464 So. 2d 217, at 218 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Usher v. Cothron, 445 So. 2d 387 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Assuming each party properly complied with all statutory duties, these decisions appear to be proper implementations of the statute, even when we consider its further…
  • Teitelbaum Concrete v. Sandelier, 506 So. 2d 1122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)
    …rthopedic injury as compensable, denied compensability of psychiatric condition as not causally related to the accident) (compare Pantry Pride v. Carter, 413 So. 2d 865 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). The instant case is closer to Wackenhut Corp. v. Freilich, 464 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), in which the e/c contested the extent of the injury. There, the e/c denied that claimant suffered brain damage or [*1125] that claimant had reached MMI. In the instant case, the e/c took the position that claimant had reached MM…

Previewing 3 of 14 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw