JOHN A. SPINKELLINK, PETITIONER,
v.
LOUIE L. WAINWRIGHT, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF OFFENDER REHABILITATION, AND DAVID H. BRIERTON, SUPERINTENDENT OF FLORIDA STATE PRISON AT STARKE, FLORIDA, RESPONDENTS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that it would not grant a certificate of probable cause, leave to appeal, or a stay of execution because the petitioner was attempting to relitigate issues already decided by the court.
The petitioner sought to relitigate constitutional issues previously decided by the court in Spinkellink v. Wainwright. The court had previously denie…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Law Of The Circuit cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
The Court has heretofore entered orders denying petitioner’s application for a certificate of probable cause and leave to appeal in forma pauperis, and denying petitioner’s motion for stay of execution.
A careful review of the submission made to us reveals that petitioner is attempting to relitigate the precise constitutional issues that were fully litigated and decided by this Court in Spinkellink v. Wainwright, 578 F. 2d 582 (5th Cir. 1978) (no petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc was filed in this Court). This decision establishes both the law of this Circuit and the law of this case as to issues presented on that appeal.
Presnell v. Georgia, - U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 235, 58 L.Ed.2d 207 (1978), decided after our prior decision, adds to the law nothing that was not previously decided by Cole v. Arkansas, 333 U.S. 196, 68 S.Ct. 514, 92 L.Ed. 644 (1948), and Gardner v. Florida, 430 U.S. 349, 97 S.Ct. 1197, 51 L.Ed.2d 393 (1977), cases cited in petitioner’s brief in the prior appeal in this case and relied upon by the Supreme Court in deciding Presnell. The Supreme Court denied certiorari from our prior decision after Presnell was decided, Spinkellink v. Wainwright, - U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 1548, 59 L.Ed.2d 796 (1979), and denied a petition for rehearing. - U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 2064, 60 L.Ed.2d 667 (1979). The Florida capital sentencing statute and procedure, Fla.Stat.Ann. § 921.141 (West), have been constitutionally upheld in Proffitt v. Florida, 428 U.S. 242, 96 S.Ct. 2960, 49 L.Ed.2d 913 (1976).
One panel of this Court is not free to override the decisions of a prior panel, particularly in relitigation of the same case. Puckett v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 522 F. 2d 1385 (1975). The Court believes it would be an inappropriate exercise of federal judicial power to stay a state execution to permit the relitigation of issues already fully presented and decided by this Court.
Judge Goldberg dissents and would grant the certificate of probable cause, leave to appeal in forma pauperis, and a stay of execution pending appeal.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Proffitt v. Florida, 428 U.S. 242 (U.S. 1976)
- Gardner v. Florida, 430 U.S. 349 (U.S. 1977)
- Cole v. Arkansas, 333 U.S. 196 (U.S. 1948)
- Spinkellink v. Louie L. Wainwright, 578 F.2d 582 (5th Cir. 1978)
- Presnell v. Georgia, 439 U.S. 14 (U.S. 1978)
- Paul E. and Ruth v. Puckett, 522 F.2d 1385 (5th Cir. 1975)