JOEL KRUMERMAN, M.D. AND SANDI KRUMERMAN, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,
v.
STATE PAVING CORPORATION AND CITY OF CORAL SPRINGS, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court reversed summary judgment against the Krumermans because the movants failed to negate genuine issues of material fact.
Summary judgment is improper when the moving party fails to negate the existence of genuine issues of material fact.
[1] A moving party seeking summary judgment bears the burden of negating the existence of genuine issues of material fact; failure to do so requires reversal.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe Krumermans appealed an adverse summary judgment entered in favor of State Paving Corporation and the City of Coral Springs.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Summary Judgment Standard Of Review cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant challenges the propriety of an adverse summary judgment. Our review of the record leads us to conclude that the appellee/movant failed to negate the existence of genuine issues of material fact. See Loranger v. State Department of Transportation, 448 So. 2d 1036 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Stahl v. Metropolitan Dade County, 438 So. 2d 14 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Crislip v. Holland, 401 So. 2d 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 411 So. 2d 380 (Fla.1981); School Board of Broward County v. Surette, 394 So. 2d 147 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. dismissed, 399 So. 2d 1146 (Fla.1981). Consequently, the final summary judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings. See Landers v. Milton, 370 So. 2d 368 (Fla.1979).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
ANSTEAD, C.J., and DOWNEY and HURLEY, JJ., concur. ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING OR CLARIFICATION
ORDERED that the March 1, 1985 Motion for Minor Clarification filed by Appellants is granted. The opinion of this Court, filed on February 27, 1985, is clarified and corrected to indicate that the summary judgments entered in favor of the City of Coral Springs and State Paving Corporation are reversed. Consequently both cost judgments are also reversed.
ORDERED that Appellee, State Paving Corporation’s March 11, 1985 Motion for Rehearing or Clarification is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Irving W. Landers et ux. v. Adelle L. Milton, 370 So. 2d 368 (Fla. 1979)
- Stahl v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 438 So. 2d 14 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
- Jackson v. State, 401 So. 2d 1115 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)
- The Sch. Bd. OF Broward Cnty. v. Surette, 394 So. 2d 147 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)
- Loranger v. State, 448 So. 2d 1036 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)