DADE ATHLETIC CLUB, INC., D/B/A DADE ATHLETIC PUB, AND DORIS FEINBERG, APPELLANTS,
v.
GENEVIEVE DELANEY, APPELLEE
DADE ATHLETIC CLUB, INC., D/B/A DADE ATHLETIC PUB, AND DORIS FEINBERG, APPELLANTS,
GENEVIEVE DELANEY, APPELLEE
464 So. 2d 1266
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1985)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Wackenhut Corp. v. Canty, 359 So. 2d 430 (Fla.1978); Griffis v. Hill, 230 So. 2d 143 (Fla.1969); Cloud v. Fallis, 110 So. 2d 669 (Fla.1959); Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Kaufman, 463 So. 2d 520 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Stevens v. Mount Vernon Fire Insurance Co., 395 So. 2d 1206 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Anderson v. Chirogianis, 384 So. 2d 1289 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), review discharged, 401 So. 2d 1322 (Fla.1981).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Goolsby v. Wiley, 547 So. 2d 227 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)…or court order. In Adkins v. Edwards, 317 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975), the second district affirmed an offset for rent for the period of time the husband was in possession without benefit of court order or agreement. Subsequently, in Finn v. Finn, 464 So. 2d 1266 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), where the husband was awarded exclusive possession under certain conditions and he later remarried which terminated his right to possession, the court computed the amount of a fair rental value offset against a claim for expenses…
-
Diedricks v. Reinhardt, 466 So. 2d 375 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)…that he was occupying the property adversely to the ex-wife. See Patterson v. Patterson, 396 So. 2d 821 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Seesholts v. Beers, 270 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972). But see Potter v. Garrett, 52 So. 2d 115 (Fla.1951)2; Finn v. Finn, 464 So. 2d 1266 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Adkins v. Edwards, 317 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975) (following Potter and Seesholts dissent, court allowed recovery of one-half rental value of residence owned by former spouses, finding showing of adversity unnecessary, as it w…
-
Bailes v. Bailes, 468 So. 2d 396 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)…to increase the ex-wife’s equity, without any provision for his being given credit for her half when the home is sold, represents an expenditure for her benefit at least substantially equivalent to the rental value of her interest. See Finn v. Finn, 464 So. 2d 1266, (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). Moreover, any uncompensated use of the home by the children and their custodian-father may properly have been regarded by the lower court as a discharge of her duty to contribute to their support. Wood v. Friedman, 388 So. 2d 13…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Cloud v. Fallis, 110 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 1959)
- The Wackenhut Corp. v. Canty, 359 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 1978)
- Chirogianis v. Anderson, 401 So. 2d 1322 (Fla. 1981)
- Griffis v. Hill, 230 So. 2d 143 (Fla. 1969)
- Anderson v. Chirogianis, 384 So. 2d 1289 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
- Stevens v. Mount Vernon Fire Ins. Co. & Sayed George Deeb, 395 So. 2d 1206 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
- AETNA Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Kaufman, 463 So. 2d 520 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)