IN RE T. BERTRAM LANCE, PETITIONER
IN RE T. BERTRAM LANCE, PETITIONER
610 F.2d 228
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1980)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 17 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
Appellate Review of the conduct of criminal proceedings should usually be postponed until after final judgment has been rendered by the trial court. See Will v. United States, 389 U.S. 90, 96, 88 S.Ct. 269, 274, 19 L.Ed.2d 305, 310 (1967) (in which review was sought by the government); cf. Helstoski v. Meanor, 442 U.S. 500, 99 S.Ct. 2445, 61 L.Ed.2d 30 (1979) (denying a writ of mandamus to a defendant who had a remedy by appeal).
All parties agree that there is no precedent for staying the trial. Having carefully considered the motion and the consequences of granting as well as those of denying it, both in the present case and as a precedent for this circuit, we conclude that it should be DENIED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (17 total)
-
In re Garfinkle v. Bankruptcy, 672 F.2d 1340 (11th Cir. 1982)
-
Nickolas P. Chilivis v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, 673 F.2d 1205 (11th Cir. 1982)
-
In re Reed v. Reed, 700 F.2d 986 (5th Cir. 1983)
Previewing 3 of 17 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Will v. United States, 389 U.S. 90 (U.S. 1967)
- Helstoski v. Meanor, 442 U.S. 500 (U.S. 1979)