UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,
v.
DONALD JAY CUBEAN A/K/A "SLIM", "FRISCO", JAMES BOYD, HAROLD T. OBEY & RUEL JOHNSON; MELVIN MCMILLIAN A/K/A "MAC", APPELLANTS, AND JOHN EARL GAINES

8th Cir. | 1979-12-26
No. 79-1557
Before HEANEY, ROSS and HENLEY, Circuit Judges.
611 F.2d 257 United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (1979) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the omission of a jury instruction regarding the federally insured status of the credit union was harmless error, as the issue was uncontroverted and not raised on direct appeal.


Facts & Procedural History

Petitioners were convicted of bank robbery and related offenses. They filed a post-conviction petition arguing their robbery convictions were invalid …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Melvin McMillian and Donald Jay Cube-an, proceeding pro se, appeal from the denial of their joint post-conviction petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

In 1975, McMillian and Cubean were convicted by a jury of robbing the Rath Employees Credit Union of Waterloo, Iowa, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113, using a firearm in the commission of a felony in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), and conspiracy to commit those crimes in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Cubean was also convicted of interstate transportation of stolen property in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2314. The convictions were affirmed by this court in United States v. McMillian, 535 F. 2d 1035 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1074, 98 S.Ct. 1262, 55 L.Ed.2d 779 (1978).

Petitioners argue in the the instant petition that their robbery convictions are invalid because the trial court failed to instruct the jury on the requirement that the credit union must have been federally insured on the date of the robbery. See 18 U.S.C. § 2113(h).

After reviewing the record, the district court denied relief. It found that the insured status of the credit union was proved beyond a reasonable doubt, and noted that the issue was uncontroverted at trial and was not raised on direct appeal. The court found that petitioners were not prejudiced by the omission, and concluded that any error was therefore harmless.

We have reviewed the record and briefs, and agree with the district court. We affirm on the basis of its well-reasoned opinion. McMillian v. United States, - F.Supp. - at---(N.D.Iowa, June 6, 1979). See Local Rule 14.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw