GEORGE GELMAN
v.
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION; GEORGE SHULOF, SUING ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL OTHER PERSONS SIMILARLY SITUATED, APPELLANT IN NO. 78-1447, V. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION; PAUL E. SLATER, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL OTHER PERSONS SIMILARLY SITUATED, APPELLANT IN NO. 78-1446, V. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION. APPEAL OF GEORGE GELMAN AND FANNIE MANN IN NO. 78-1445
GEORGE GELMAN
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION; GEORGE SHULOF, SUING ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL OTHER PERSONS SIMILARLY SITUATED, APPELLANT IN NO. 78-1447, V. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION; PAUL E. SLATER, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL OTHER PERSONS SIMILARLY SITUATED, APPELLANT IN NO. 78-1446, V. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION. APPEAL OF GEORGE GELMAN AND FANNIE MANN IN NO. 78-1445
612 F.2d 799
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (1980)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The Court is evenly divided on this appeal.
The judgment of the district court will be affirmed:
Each party shall bear its own cost.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. McCASKILL, 676 F.2d 995 (4th Cir. 1982)
-
United States v. Scheer, 729 F.2d 164 (2d Cir. 1984)
-
United States v. Bryant, 612 F.2d 806 (4th Cir. 1979)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence