RUTH A. WITTENBERG ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, APPELLANTS,
v.
CONTINENTAL REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, LTD.-74A ET AL., DEFENDANTS, APPELLEES
RUTH A. WITTENBERG ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, APPELLANTS,
CONTINENTAL REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, LTD.-74A ET AL., DEFENDANTS, APPELLEES
625 F.2d 5
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (1980)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 32 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The decision of the district court, 478 F.Supp. 504, is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in the thoughtful opinion of the district court. We note only for the sake of completeness that plaintiffs never availed themselves of the opportunity offered by the district court to amend their complaint after its decision.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (16 total)
-
United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877 (9th Cir. 1981)
-
United States v. Barton, 647 F.2d 224 (2d Cir. 1981)
-
United States v. Norton, 867 F.2d 1354 (11th Cir. 1989)
Previewing 3 of 16 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence