CARL BENTLEY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
JAMES BECK, SHERIFF, AND LEROY GLENN, RESPONDENTS-APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Prison officials cannot deny job assignments solely based on race, even within a prison setting.
A prisoner alleged he was denied a kitchen orderly position because of his race, despite the deputy sheriff's claim that only black individuals would …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Discretion Of Prison Officials cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
Plaintiff, a prisoner in Richmond County Jail in Augusta, Georgia, filed this 42 U.S. C.A. § 1983 action for injunctive and declaratory relief against the sheriff and kitchen orderly deputy of the jail. He alleged that several times he asked the deputy to permit him to work as an orderly in the jail kitchen and was twice told by the deputy that he would be appointed as soon as there was an opening for a “white boy.” Plaintiff alleges that several blacks have subsequently been put in the kitchen positions. It was also alleged that the deputy said that he did not like whites to work in the kitchen and as long as he was deputy he would only permit blacks to work there.
The district court dismissed the case without requiring a response. The court held that there is no constitutional right to be assigned any particular job in a prison, citing Bryan v. Werner, 516 F. 2d 233 (3d Cir. 1975), and Gardner v. Johnson, 429 F.Supp. 432, 434 (E.D. Mich. 1977). Appel-lee’s brief makes the same argument.
Both the court’s order and appellee miss the point. As plaintiff states in his pro se brief, he is not claiming to have a constitutional right to a particular job. His claim is that his application for the position of kitchen orderly should not be denied solely because of his race, clearly unconstitutional conduct. While we have stated that prison officials must have broad discretion in classifying prisoners in terms of their custodial status, McGruder v. Phelps, 608 F. 2d 1023, 1026 (5th Cir. 1979), this does not permit prison officials to engage in the type of overt racial discrimination alleged here. Inmates have the constitutional right to be free from racial discrimination. Martin v. Wainwright, 525 F. 2d 983 (5th Cir. 1976); Henry v. Van Cleve, 469 F. 2d 687 (5th Cir. 1972).
The judgment of the district court is reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Haywood Williams, Jr. v. Meese, 926 F.2d 994 (10th Cir. 1991)
-
Anthony v. Burkhart, 28 F. Supp. 2d 1239 (M.D. Fla. 1998)…icials cannot discriminate against Plaintiff on the basis of his age, race, or handicap in choosing whether to assign him a job or in choosing what job to assign him. Williams v. Meese, 926 F.2d 994, 998 (10th Cir.1991); Bentley v. Beck, 625 F.2d 70, 70-71 (5th Cir.1980). Furthermore, prison officials cannot punish Plaintiff for exercising his First Amendment rights by denying him certain job assignments or transferring him from one job to another. Williams, 926 F.2d at 998. Claims Again…
-
Moore v. U.S. Dep't OF Agric., 993 F.2d 1222 (5th Cir. 1993)
Authorities Cited
- McGRUDER v. Phelps, 608 F.2d 1023 (5th Cir. 1979)
- Bryan v. Werner, 516 F.2d 233 (3d Cir. 1975)
- Henry v. VAN Cleve, 469 F.2d 687 (5th Cir. 1972)
- John-Tyrone Martin v. Louie L. Wainwright, 525 F.2d 983 (5th Cir. 1976)