T.L.F., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Rasmussen v. S. Fla. Blood Serv., Inc., 500 So. 2d 533 (Fla. 1987)
  …BARKETT, Justice. We have for review South Florida Blood Service, Inc. v. Rasmussen, 467 So. 2d 798 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). In that decision, the district court certified the following as a question of great public importance: Do the privacy interests of volunteer blood donors and a blood service’s and society’s interest in maintaining a strong volun…
• Boynton v. Milton Burglass, M.D., 590 So. 2d 446 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
  …uture, a warning may be communicated notwithstanding those concerns. While the effect of a judicial decision upon the day to day actions of real people is subject to grave doubt in almost every instance, see South Florida Blood Service v. Rasmussen, 467 So. 2d 798, 804-07 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (Schwartz, C.J., dissenting), aff’d, 500 So. 2d 533 (Fla.1987), it is clear that the decision in this case cannot serve the court’s independent purposes because, for better or worse, the legislature has disagreed with them…
• Alterra Healthcare Corp. v. Est. OF Francis Shelley, 827 So. 2d 936 (Fla. 2002)
  …y constitute state action that may impinge on constitutional rights, including the constitutional right of privacy. See Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehart, 467 U.S. 20, 104 S.Ct. 2199, 81 L.Ed.2d 17, (1984); South Florida Blood Serv., Inc. v. Rasmussen, 467 So. 2d 798, 803 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), aff’d, 500 So. 2d 533 (Fla.1987). As recognized by our supreme court's decision in Rasmussen, “[t]he potential for invasion of privacy is inherent in the litigation process.” 500 So. 2d at 535. Id. at 790. . In other juris…

Authorities Cited

• G. C. v. State, 407 So. 2d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
• J.W. v. State, 467 So. 2d 796 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
• A.K. v. State, 439 So. 2d 335 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)