THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
PETER E. NAPIER, RESPONDENT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Disciplinary Rule 9-102(A) cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Upon a complaint by The Florida Bar this Court appointed a referee to conduct a hearing regarding Napier’s alleged misconduct. Napier tendered a conditional guilty plea for consent judgment, acknowledging his violation of article XI, Rule 11.02(4) of the Integration Rule, Bylaws section 11.-02(4)(c) and Disciplinary Rules 6-101(A)(3), 7-102(A)(5), 9-102(A), 9-102(B)(3) and 9-102(B)(4). The referee recommended that Napier be found guilty in accordance with his conditional plea and that he be given a public reprimand without appearance before the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar and payment of costs.
Neither side contests the referee’s report which we hereby adopt. Publication of this opinion in Southern Reporter will serve as the public reprimand.
Judgment for costs in the amount of $914.37 is hereby entered against respondent, for which let execution issue.
It is so ordered.
ADKINS, A.C.J., and OVERTON, ALDERMAN, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (33 total)
-
Murray v. State, 491 So. 2d 1120 (Fla. 1986)…at [*1124] teries. Correctly, then, while the trial court could assess only concurrent mandatory mínimums for the sexual batteries, it properly required an additional three years for the armed robbery. 471 So. 2d at 72-73. Unlike in State v. Ames, 467 So. 2d 994 (Fla.1985), we find the sexual battery of the victim sufficiently separate in nature, time, and place from the armed robbery charge to justify application of the consecutive mandatory minimums. While the entire event could be labeled a “single crimi…
-
State v. Thomas, 487 So. 2d 1043 (Fla. 1986)…e criminal episode. In Wilson, where the defendant possessed a gun while kidnapping the one victim and then taking her by car a short distance and sexually assaulting her, we held that the offenses occurred during a single episode. In State v. Ames, 467 So. 2d 994 (Fla.1985), where the defendant possessed a gun while breaking into a woman’s house, robbing her in one room and raping her in another, we held that the three offenses occurred during a single episode. In State v. Enmund, 476 So. 2d 165 (Fla.1985),…
-
State v. Christian, 692 So. 2d 889 (Fla. 1997)…tual offender mandatory minimum terms). A violation of the habitual offender statute is procedural (i.e., it results from the accumulation of offenses) and does not itself cause injury to any victim. . See Thomas, supra note 1. .See State v. Ames, 467 So. 2d 994 (Fla. 1985) (disapproving stacking of two firearm mandatory minimum terms where defendant committed burglary, robbery, and sexual battery on same victim, without firing weapon); Palmer v. State, 438 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1983) (disapproving stacking of thir…
Previewing 3 of 33 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence