BRADY OTIS BYRD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
BRADY OTIS BYRD, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
467 So. 2d 1093
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1985)
Caution
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
After carefully reviewing the entire record, we find no reversible error. The orders of probation entered by the trial court, however, incorrectly state the offenses of selling cocaine and selling cannabis, while the jury found Byrd guilty of the lesser included offense of possession of cocaine and Byrd pled nolo contendere to possession of less than twenty grams of cannabis. The orders of probation must be corrected to reflect the proper offenses. Accordingly, this cause is remanded for correction of these errors.
JOANOS, JJ., concur. THOMPSON and ZEHMER,
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dobbins v. Dobbins, 584 So. 2d 1113 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)…at a change of primary physical residence is warranted, particularly in light of the complete absence of any expert testimony that the children’s emotional problems will be alleviated if their custody is placed primarily with H. Mulford v. Sullivan, 467 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). A drastic alteration of custody such as in the instant case cannot be based merely on minor difficulties experienced by the parties. Compare Tessler v. Tessler, 539 So. 2d 522 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 549 So. 2d 1014 (Fla.…
-
Dixon v. Iuculano, 505 So. 2d 7 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)…PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See, Mulford v. Sullivan, 467 So. 2d 1093 (Fla 1st DCA 1985); Johnson v. Johnson, 422 So. 2d 1013 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). ERVIN, NIMMONS and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.…
-
Metcalfe v. Metcalfe, 655 So. 2d 1251 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)…to remain in the custody of the husband, and that the best interests of the children would be promoted if the wife, who has since remarried, obtained custody of the children. See Spradley v. Spradley, 335 So. 2d 822 (Fla.1976); Midford v. Sullivan, 467 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); McIntyre v. McIntyre, 452 So. 2d 14, 19 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); see also Ritsi v. Ritsi, 160 So. 2d 159, 164 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964). Finally, there is no merit to the remaining points on appeal raised by the husband. In particular, th…